Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: my 454 swap

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    montana
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasty-Z View Post
    Check the throttle shaft play in the TBI , the BBC TBI's are notorious for elongating the holes the throttle shaft rides through , causing the exact problem you describe.

    As others have said , if the IAC counts are at zero , un metered air is entering somewhere or the throttle blades have been opened up too far .

    Does it do the idle creep with and without your scan tool hooked up to the ALDL port , some of the different scan tools I have come across would cause an idle creep if left hooked up to monitor data , never could really explain it ........

    TOM
    The scan tool does have a small effect on it. I have seen that on some of the tbi stuff where with the scan tool connected they idle 1000+.

  2. #2
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Quote Originally Posted by black dawg View Post
    The scan tool does have a small effect on it. I have seen that on some of the tbi stuff where with the scan tool connected they idle 1000+.
    That usually means it is in ALDL mode, idle RPM is set to 1000. I beleive it also changes spark too...

    The 350 prom is just totally differant then a 454 prom.

    Like I said above the 454 chip you have is open loop idle and been updated twice. The 350 prom is idling correctly because it's a closed loop idle prom.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    montana
    Posts
    53
    would it be better to tune on the 454 chip? can it be made closed loop idle? Or would it be easier to just make the 350 chip match the 454 engine.

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,875
    Swapped in a 74 454 that I added a stock vortec cam to.
    Cam from 96 or newer engine? Did you add roller lifters as well?


    Does it do the idle creep with and without your scan tool hooked up to the ALDL port , some of the different scan tools I have come across would cause an idle creep if left hooked up to monitor data , never could really explain it ........
    Because some scanners use "10k" or "ALDL mode" which enables different settings in the calibration for testing and diagnosis.

    Old trick for setting minimum air is to cut a strip of paper 1/4" wide then close between throttle plate and bore at 90 deg to shaft. Proper setting gives slight drag when paper is pulled out. Do when engine is warm for best results.

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    montana
    Posts
    53
    Used retrofit rollers and the gen 6 timing set and cam retainer.

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected! JeepsAndGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    alabama
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,705
    Quote Originally Posted by black dawg View Post
    would it be better to tune on the 454 chip? can it be made closed loop idle? Or would it be easier to just make the 350 chip match the 454 engine.
    If the 454 bin you have has been superceded twice, and the 350 bin you have runs significantly better, then I (just me personally) would tune that bin.
    Just my $0.02 worth.
    79 Jeep Cherokee, AMC 401, T-18 manual trans, hydroboost, 16197427 MPFI system---the toy

    93 Jeep YJ Wrangler, 4.0L, 5 speed, 8.8 rear, homebrew hub conversion and big brakes, hydroboost, 2.5in OME lift, 31x10.50's---the daily driver

    99 Jeep WJ Grand Cherokee limited, 4.0L, auto, 2wd, leather and power everything, 99% stock---the long distance highway ride.

  7. #7
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    I'd agree with JeepsandGuns if that was the only 2 bins I had. But we have plenty of 454 bins to start with including the AZFT it was superceeded to.

    Yes you can make that a Closed Loop Idle bin but then it has been superceeded twice, so I'd still start with a differant one like the AZFT it was superceeded to.

    I've also used the AZFT a few times for a starter tune and had no issues.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  8. #8
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    montana
    Posts
    53
    Well, I got the 454 prom to work for me. It seems my balancer has slipped, so timing was way to advanced. I also lowered my fuel psi from 15 to 12 and this leaned it out to where it works. I think these injectors are to sloppy, because I have never seen that little of pressure change affect the o2 as much as this did. The injectors do look drippy at cold start.

    what would you expect to see for warmed up open loop idle o2 readings at 3500ft? I am .89ish
    what would you expect for WOT? I get from .96-1.0

  9. #9
    Fuel Injected! gregs78cam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    N. Idaho
    Posts
    767
    Well in a TBI dropping from 15 to 12 psi is about a 10% difference in flow. I would think an OL idle should be close to .50 maybe .60, ideally .45, but that will depend on your VE table. 0.89V at idle sounds really rich. .96 - 1.0 at WOT sounds only slightly rich, but a NBO2 is not even close to being useful for WOT tuning IMHO.
    Last edited by gregs78cam; 05-04-2012 at 07:49 PM.
    1978 Camaro Type LT, 383, Dual TBI, '7427, 4L80E
    1981 Camaro Z-28 Clone, T-Tops, 350/TH350
    1981 Camaro Berlinetta, V-6, 3spd
    1974 Chevy/GMC Truck, '90 TBI 350, '7427, TH350, NP203, 6" lift, 35s

  10. #10
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Quote Originally Posted by black dawg View Post
    Well, I got the 454 prom to work for me. It seems my balancer has slipped, so timing was way to advanced. I also lowered my fuel psi from 15 to 12 and this leaned it out to where it works. I think these injectors are to sloppy, because I have never seen that little of pressure change affect the o2 as much as this did. The injectors do look drippy at cold start.

    what would you expect to see for warmed up open loop idle o2 readings at 3500ft? I am .89ish
    what would you expect for WOT? I get from .96-1.0
    3 psi is not a lot on MPFI when base pressure is 43.5 but 3 psi is a lot on a TBI system based on 13 psi.

    The O2 readings your showing are rich, but at 3500 feet I would expect that.

    Narrow Band O2 sensor is only measuring 1 volt and designed to be about .45 for 14.7 to 1 AFR so higher is richer and lower is leaner. But it is only accurate around .45 and ECM keeps it swinging back and forth there.

    Wide Band O2 sensor uses 0 to 5 volts so it is 5 times more accurate and designed to measure AFR, not just keep it at 14.7 to 1.

    Having these old injectors serviced is great money spent. If you don't have someone local look for Mr Injector. I've seen between 5 and 13% difference in injector flow rates from service.

    With the cam change your only option for great running engine is a chip tune. If you don't have equiptment needed, then you've really done all you can. You need to get these mechanical issues in order before tuning anyway. If you want to get into tuning then buy equiptment and spend some time. If you don't want to spend time and money then buy a cable to record data and you can buy a tuned chip. Either option is about $150. to do it right.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •