Results 1 to 15 of 103

Thread: Next EEHack update

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Californiacation
    Age
    57
    Posts
    834
    Hi kur4o,
    I'm glad to do some experimenting with you guys. I'm going to order some flash(Is it same for obd2 too?) and sockets in a few minutes for future but we can play with on-board till all the smoke comes out. I'll keep a smoke vac handy so I can put it back in
    -Carl

  2. #2
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    There is also some header left that have most of the flash chip pins. Wring the header and adding vpp to the board will be really cool experiments we are trying to do for a long time.[Recovering without removing the chip.
    after flashhack has stabilized i do plan to catch this spare ECM on fire attempting to do it.

    i do think its possible, because the tunercat/winflash guy has offered a very cheap repair service, and someone i know used it, opened the ECM, and found the chips untouched, so he must have built some hardware to do it...? (either that or traded a core, but i doubt it)

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    Quote Originally Posted by In-Tech View Post
    Hi kur4o,
    I'm glad to do some experimenting with you guys. I'm going to order some flash(Is it same for obd2 too?) and sockets in a few minutes for future but we can play with on-board till all the smoke comes out. I'll keep a smoke vac handy so I can put it back in

    96-97 have 128kb tside chip intel an28f010, eside is an28f512

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Californiacation
    Age
    57
    Posts
    834
    Quote Originally Posted by kur4o View Post
    96-97 have 128kb tside chip intel an28f010, eside is an28f512
    Thanks for the reply, getting ready to order...are any of these "B" chips that read from the bottom or just as your part numbers?

    Also, do I use only intel brand or does it matter since it's flash? I ask because I might already have some NOS in my stash pile/box.
    -Carl

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,478
    Quote Originally Posted by In-Tech View Post
    Thanks for the reply, getting ready to order...are any of these "B" chips that read from the bottom or just as your part numbers?

    Also, do I use only intel brand or does it matter since it's flash? I ask because I might already have some NOS in my stash pile/box.
    Look for N28f010 or N28f512 , Intel brand in PLLC32 package. a is for automotive application, extended temp range, but they are nowhere to be found

    Brand matters because of different command set. The pcm is set for use with intel brand.

    There is different access time, the lower the better, anything below -120 ns will do the job.

    You can also get the 128kb from a 96-97 blackbox pcm.

    If you have something available give it a try, they will work. I am sure your onboard` ones will work too. So you might not really need them.

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Californiacation
    Age
    57
    Posts
    834
    Thank You
    -Carl

  7. #7
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    flashhack is really behaving well with extreme testing. i unplugged the usb cable and then restarted the program, and it flashed again like nothing was wrong. i will do a resume flash feature too to avoid re-erasing.

    even if your car battery goes low, if you keep ECM powered enough to stay running, you can go plug a battery charger in and try again, even days later. you just have to be careful not to drop ignition power.

    if kur4o's ecm patch works i'm going to be so happy and it'll be insanely hard to brick one of these things.

  8. #8
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    fixed some more bugs. i'm not very good at math so this is all a struggle. the block mapping algorithm had a off-by-one error that took forever to track down (when you have tons of offsets/sizes/lengths its bound to happen) but it's finally writing all the blocks without re-rewriting anything.

    one cool thing that testing has revealed, is re-writing a block doesn't seem to cause trouble (since you're setting a bit that's already set, and the it passes verification no problem) so if you failed a write due to a communication error or power failure, you could probably just safely continue on without re-erasing and causing further risk.

    i'm also writing a new progress display that will show you more clearly what's going on, but since it uses matrix transforms and i suck with math, it's not going well yet. will be testing kur4o's recovery patch again tonight and lets hope for the best. once that's working i'll release a beta and let people try it out.

Similar Threads

  1. EEHack 5.0 2020 update
    By steveo in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-30-2022, 06:37 AM
  2. EEHack 2019 update
    By steveo in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: 02-20-2020, 05:31 PM
  3. $4D update
    By steveo in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-19-2014, 09:33 PM
  4. Tables won't update
    By POZE in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-17-2013, 09:48 AM
  5. TunerPro V5 update!
    By EagleMark in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-16-2012, 02:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •