What are you using to monitor/ log this?
That's one thing that's bothered me- not having a quick reference for commanded usec/pulse across the RPM vs MAP or vs gm/sec airflow range. I could probably extrapolate that with a spot-on set of VE tables for stock and/ or my particular setup. I'll just have to start doing some datalogging and get some actual commanded pulsewidths from idle to rev limit. I'd have imagined that low adders would need to be in effect for a stock engine/ tune, target idle speed of 800RPM (M6) or 800 in gear/ 650 park & neutral (A4). Particularly for stick cars to avoid lean surge/ chugging at idle into launch mode/ acceleration enrichment.
It is also apparent that I need to adjust my MAF tables at this point. The dyno tune I paid for in 2009 used stock, unaltered tables. If it was tuned "appropriately" fat across the board so stock tables worked, I can understand an older school of thought and "it works" way of doing things, but now that I'm trying to accurately model behavior and response I've gone back through and changed a number of things accordingly. Now that I seem to be leaner everywhere, MAF table changes should yield additional benefit. Datalogging now and wideband as soon as feasible are next steps for my own car.
Meanwhile, here's another 47# injector. M-9593-G302. I'll post up the 19# M-9593-C302 a little later.
Bookmarks