Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Which tables for cold start?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! brian617's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by CDeeZ View Post
    Brian, thank you for pointing that out. I've been using Dave W's spreadsheet to dial in the VE and it still needs work, but not sure how else to do it other than drive around and keep logging and adjusting the VE tables.....
    Its really not that big of deal if your commanded and actual AFRs arent perfect, With a custom build and so many modifiers (tables) in the 427 PCM its tough to pull off. I think I remember cheating my cold AFR table to get the actual I wanted.
    89 K1500 Scottsdale 5.7L 5spd 3:42 RamJet cam Dart iron TBI heads 427 PCM swap
    95 C2500 Cheyenne 6.5L turbo diesel 4L80e 4:10 DB2-4911 Manual pump conversion 0411 PCM trans control 2Bar COS
    05 Outback XT 2.5L turbo gas auto

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! CDeeZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jokelahoma
    Posts
    422
    Well my comment about the low MAP colums in the VE being weird. I was looking at your bin with the $0E XDF. Opened two instances of TunerPro and loaded your BIN with $0D and my BIN with $0E and the data isn't screwed up now when viewing yours with the wrong XDF. Oops.

    Now let's see, where to go from here?

    And we still don't know why GM had the Open Loop AFR table stupid rich in that stock 350 4L80 BIN I posted do we????

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected! CDeeZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jokelahoma
    Posts
    422
    Well this is revealing doing a side by side here. This has got to be the problem with it not wanting to start when cold and running soo poorly... The factory 350 4L80 bin is commanding a stupid rich AFR for some odd reason???

    Check out these screenshots, one is comparing my bin after I leaned it out a bit to sturgills..... And the other one compares the stock 350 4L80 bin to a stock 350 4L60/700r4 bin.... Why in the world did they set up the AFR table so crazy rich in the 350 4L80 bin?????

    On an unrelated note, I just snapped in a USB mouse to the tuning laptop, wow what a difference, why didn't I do this a long time ago??? Using the touchpad is such a pain in the ass compared to a real mouse.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by CDeeZ; 02-08-2019 at 11:39 PM.

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected! sturgillbd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, VA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    504
    My open loop afr table is not stock. I had to enrichen some because I was too lean.. My tune isn't perfect but the last 400 mile round trip I made in my Jeep, I got 19.5 mpg running 60-65 mph on the road and the M38A1 (cj5) is not exactly aerodynamic. I am running the Edelbrock Victor JR 2v Sportsman intake with EQ heads. I have the 1.6875 bore tbi (standard sbc size) and I start going into a vacuum after 4000 rpm. At 6000, my map reading is about 80kpa at WOT. You will have to just play with the values until you get it where you want it. As for a lean pop on cold throttle, the AE settings are easily overshot. I also run 61pph injectors at close to 30 psi. Im a little rich at idle but the pcm compensates decently. You were surprised at the settings difference between the 4L80 bin and mine. Now compare it to some of the CPI bins for the blazers and also look at say a 454 tbi bin like BMHK. Lots of tables that seem fudged just to get GM's desired effect.

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected! brian617's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by sturgillbd View Post
    the AE settings are easily overshot.
    This thread is bringing back a lot of my own early problems LOL.

    When running higher pressures on the injectors AE (TPS and MAP) will have to be reduced quite a bit, or did in my case. If the duration of the pulse width during AE is the same high pressure vs low pressure, quite a bit more fuel is being injected at the same PW. Of course this depends on engine combos, intake manifolds etc.

    Also -40* Celsius is not likely in Oklahoma
    Last edited by brian617; 02-09-2019 at 01:10 AM.
    89 K1500 Scottsdale 5.7L 5spd 3:42 RamJet cam Dart iron TBI heads 427 PCM swap
    95 C2500 Cheyenne 6.5L turbo diesel 4L80e 4:10 DB2-4911 Manual pump conversion 0411 PCM trans control 2Bar COS
    05 Outback XT 2.5L turbo gas auto

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected! CDeeZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Jokelahoma
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by sturgillbd View Post
    My open loop afr table is not stock. I had to enrichen some because I was too lean.. My tune isn't perfect but the last 400 mile round trip I made in my Jeep, I got 19.5 mpg running 60-65 mph on the road and the M38A1 (cj5) is not exactly aerodynamic. I am running the Edelbrock Victor JR 2v Sportsman intake with EQ heads. I have the 1.6875 bore tbi (standard sbc size) and I start going into a vacuum after 4000 rpm. At 6000, my map reading is about 80kpa at WOT. You will have to just play with the values until you get it where you want it. As for a lean pop on cold throttle, the AE settings are easily overshot. I also run 61pph injectors at close to 30 psi. Im a little rich at idle but the pcm compensates decently. You were surprised at the settings difference between the 4L80 bin and mine. Now compare it to some of the CPI bins for the blazers and also look at say a 454 tbi bin like BMHK. Lots of tables that seem fudged just to get GM's desired effect.
    Right, I noticed that you richened it up a little bit. I will try either that table as you set it, or, the even leaner table from the BJYL $0D bin..... Either way, it will be way leaner than the table I've been dealing with from that stock 350 4L80 bin.... My buddy has a CJ2A, a '46... He got it for $25 I think.... Pretty rusty, but still way cool.

    Yeah I just don't get why GM set up that 350 4L80 bin (whatever the BCC is) to be so rich in cold temps, or rich everywhere for that matter. But like you said, likely they fudged the tables to get wherever it was they were going.......

    Quote Originally Posted by brian617 View Post
    This thread is bringing back a lot of my own early problems LOL.

    When running higher pressures on the injectors AE (TPS and MAP) will have to be reduced quite a bit, or did in my case. If the duration of the pulse width during AE is the same high pressure vs low pressure, quite a bit more fuel is being injected at the same PW. Of course this depends on engine combos, intake manifolds etc.

    Also -40* Celsius is not likely in Oklahoma
    Suffering builds character right :) Brian, will you post your tune also when you get a chance please?? You're right, -40*C isn't likely here, but -21*C is possible. A couple years ago we had one night where it got down to -7*F..... I hate the cold.... Give me 100+*F any day thankyou very much lol.

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected! brian617's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Arkansas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by CDeeZ View Post
    Suffering builds character right :) Brian, will you post your tune also when you get a chance please?? You're right, -40*C isn't likely here, but -21*C is possible. A couple years ago we had one night where it got down to -7*F..... I hate the cold.... Give me 100+*F any day thankyou very much lol.
    I'll try to remember to email my .bin to work so I can post it for you. It is based on a BJDR .bin.
    89 K1500 Scottsdale 5.7L 5spd 3:42 RamJet cam Dart iron TBI heads 427 PCM swap
    95 C2500 Cheyenne 6.5L turbo diesel 4L80e 4:10 DB2-4911 Manual pump conversion 0411 PCM trans control 2Bar COS
    05 Outback XT 2.5L turbo gas auto

Similar Threads

  1. Stumbling After Cold Start
    By 90Vette in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-10-2019, 09:11 AM
  2. Cold start issues
    By moquinn in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-17-2017, 02:45 AM
  3. Too rich after cold start?
    By BigBanks78 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-09-2017, 07:27 PM
  4. cold start and warm up is terrible.
    By Scorp1us in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-29-2014, 02:35 AM
  5. Ultra rich at cold start???
    By jameslleary in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-20-2012, 03:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •