Results 1 to 15 of 238

Thread: Narrowband Tuning Tool

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    please demonstrate why it isn't working for you

    but imo you're trying to do something that shouldn't need to be done, my program analyzes the whole data set, why would you only want a small portion?

    edit: in the background of your screenshot i see your attempt to make a nonesnse table. i am glad that my software wouldn't let you make it.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    bump for more beta testers! so far it's working pretty well, i tried it on a friend's tpi car that trims were out to lunch (didnt have time to reprogram with the changes, but the analysis looked sane..)

    if you can't test it for me, at least throw me some CSV logs from your own driving and let me parse them so i can ensure it's working with maximum number of environments.

    if you make a custom table that works properly, please screenshot (and tell me what mask it's for) it so i can add it to presets too

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Ogden, UT
    Age
    40
    Posts
    139
    Here is a screenshot for my headers and filters with $0E. I would attach the log I'm using but it's forced open loop for WBO2 tuning. The $0D table you already have configured works for $0E also. I'm going to be swapping the intake, throttle body, and injectors soon so I would be starting all over anyway.

    Capture1.JPG
    1990 Chevrolet K2500, RCLB, Blueprint 383 TBI (16197427 ECM / 61 lb/hr / 16 psi FP), NV4500, NP241C, 4.10

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Colorado
    Age
    39
    Posts
    120
    1.PNG

    Ive only ran 2 logs through it so far, but seems to be giving very uniform results. I am using $E6 for 16168625.. the screenshot is for the off idle VE table. Its the same setup as the $0D mask. I could load old datalogs csv if you would like to try for yourself. Ill do some more logs and post results tomorrow evening.

  6. #6
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,056
    Ive only ran 2 logs through it so far, but seems to be giving very uniform results. I am using $E6 for 16168625.. the screenshot is for the off idle VE table. Its the same setup as the $0D mask. I could load old datalogs csv if you would like to try for yourself. Ill do some more logs and post results tomorrow evening.
    cool! those are some huge trims, can you send me that log? that might be a good test case to see if my algorithm is tuned properly..

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected! dud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Age
    55
    Posts
    30
    Love the program. Using the "Loose Cell" setting, it pretty closely matches what my spreadsheets come up with. What I like the most is that it is quicker than excel when loading several datalogs. And I don't need a separate tool for ALDLdroid and TunerPro.

    Thanks for the source too. I use linux for pretty much everything I do and I have been able to compile the program on linux and it works great. Just have a bug when trying to copy contents of the clipboard into TunerPro(running on wine). I think it has to do with the way X11 (linux) sees the clipboard. Not a biggie though. I can use a native linux text editor to do the hand off. The clipboard works fine if I'm running both programs, Trimalyzer & TunerPro, with wine.

    I'm no programmer by any means, but I have edited the dictionary to include some extra terms so the "Field Mappings" will be auto detected. I also edited the "definition" files trying to get more filters to be auto detected. No joy on that one though.

    I too am using the $E6 mask.

    I've attached some screenshots of the way I set it up.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #8
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Colorado
    Age
    39
    Posts
    120
    Quote Originally Posted by steveo View Post
    cool! those are some huge trims, can you send me that log? that might be a good test case to see if my algorithm is tuned properly..
    Here is the csv log file that I ran through. This was the first change from the stock bin. Please let me know if it looks to be doing right. Before this one tune I would run rich all the time, 105-120..now Im seeing some in the low to mid 130's at highway steady speeds. Im going to keep running logs through. Great tool, and thanks for making this for everyone!
    Attached Files Attached Files

Similar Threads

  1. LS1 Flash Tool Released
    By antus in forum OBDII Tuning
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: 02-28-2024, 07:02 PM
  2. Scan Tool Data Help
    By Kaweh in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2015, 12:15 AM
  3. LT1 auto-tuning tool (web based)
    By steveo in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-17-2014, 08:07 AM
  4. Narrowband o2 sensors all created equal?
    By Accrdwgnguy in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-19-2013, 12:46 AM
  5. TunerPro Rt used as a scan tool?
    By mudbuggy in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-10-2012, 03:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •