Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39

Thread: Truck falls flat after 3000 rpm.

  1. #16
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    416
    Here is the adx and xdf i am using. I do not see any of those tcc controls. Here are some pics of what i have. Does the th400 tcc coast tps% control the kickdown?

  2. #17
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Im going to try out the ASDU bin and see how that goes. I was tuning ve before by combining table 1 and table 2. I know its user preference but i thought i read something about leaving some values in table 2 because some other table or something looks at table 2 and if its zeroed out it cant read it, idk. Can i still tune using daves excel spreadsheet by just using ve table 1 and leaving table 2 alone. Also why does ve table 2 go up to 6400 rpm when ve table 1 only goes up to 3200 rpm? Thanks for everyones help so far.
    I'm not sure why GM set the 7747 up this way. It would make more sense to have one VE table that goes up to 6400RPM.....I'm not sure if I understand your question, but you can 0 out the adder table. The ECM will use the values from the VE1 main table 3200 row for all RPM's higher than 3200. If you need to richen things up after 3200RPM, you can use the cells in the adder table (3600-6400) to richen up the mixture at higher RPMs.
    Last edited by mmigacz; 01-27-2017 at 10:30 PM.
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  3. #18
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Here is the adx and xdf i am using. I do not see any of those tcc controls. Here are some pics of what i have. Does the th400 tcc coast tps% control the kickdown?
    Use this mask:
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  4. #19
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    416
    Ok I am going to use $42-1227747-V5.2.adx and xdf $42-1227747-V5.9.3.xdf instead of the ones i was using.

  5. #20
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Ok I am going to use $42-1227747-V5.2.adx and xdf $42-1227747-V5.9.3.xdf instead of the ones i was using.
    There are significantly more options with these later versions. They rock!
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  6. #21
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    416
    Boy was i working with an antiquated adx and xdf. These new ones are alot more user friendly. I though i could only use the ones for a 3 speed so i never used these.

  7. #22
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    416
    There is a scalar for stoich afr that says 14.7 for E0 fuel and 14.13 for E10 fuel. Right now that scalar is set at 14.7. Should i change that to 14.13 because all fuel seems to be E10 unless specified E0 at the pump? Would my ve tables actually be off if i left the stoich afr at 14.7? When you hover over scalars or tables in the parameter tree sometimes a box pops up telling you what that parameter does. The box dissapears after a few seconds. In order for me to read them i have to keep hovering over them to get the text box to pop up. I know there is a way to keep the text box open im just not sure how to do that and its driving me crazy. Does anyone know how to keep the text box open? Also is there a way to change the temperature reading from Celsius to Fahrenheit? I have to keep going to google to convert and it gets annoying.
    Last edited by joegreen; 01-28-2017 at 03:57 AM.

  8. #23
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    There is a scalar for stoich afr that says 14.7 for E0 fuel and 14.13 for E10 fuel. Right now that scalar is set at 14.7. Should i change that to 14.13 because all fuel seems to be E10 unless specified E0 at the pump? .
    Yes, it’s not a bad idea. Your values in your open loop tables (including PE) will be closer to reality. Which means they might need to be tweaked slightly if you change it.
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Would my ve tables actually be off if i left the stoich afr at 14.7?
    If you have been tuning in closed loop with BLM’s, the VE tables do not need to change. This is assuming the gas you were using while tuning the VE tables was E10. That scaler does nothing when you’re in closed loop. However, when you go into open loop, the ECM assumes stoich is 14.13 in each cell of the VE table. This is the base line to calculate open loop AFRs values (usually less than stoich). So, if you reduce that scaler to 14.13 your open loop AFR’s (in reality) will be slightly leaner. You probably won’t notice it, unless you have a wideband to watch it change slightly.
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Also is there a way to change the temperature reading from Celsius to Fahrenheit? I have to keep going to google to convert and it gets annoying.
    If you give me an example parameter that you want to change, I can walk you thru it?
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    When you hover over scalars or tables in the parameter tree sometimes a box pops up telling you what that parameter does. The box dissapears after a few seconds. In order for me to read them i have to keep hovering over them to get the text box to pop up. I know there is a way to keep the text box open im just not sure how to do that and its driving me crazy. Does anyone know how to keep the text box open?
    See the attached picture
    Last edited by mmigacz; 01-28-2017 at 03:41 PM.
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  9. #24
    Fuel Injected! uncabob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Age
    87
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    . Does anyone know how to keep the text box open?.
    Mornin Joe. Try right clicking on the parameter then choose edit (first choice) and it will stay until you exit edit. Sorry but I didn't notice the last picture. Bob
    Last edited by uncabob; 01-28-2017 at 05:39 PM.
    Don't force it, get a bigger hammer!

  10. #25
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by mmigacz View Post
    Yes, it’s not a bad idea. Your values in your open loop tables (including PE) will be closer to reality. Which means they might need to be tweaked slightly if you change it. If you have been tuning in closed loop with BLM’s, the VE tables do not need to change. This is assuming the gas you were using while tuning the VE tables was E10. That scaler does nothing when you’re in closed loop. However, when you go into open loop, the ECM assumes stoich is 14.13 in each cell of the VE table. This is the base line to calculate open loop AFRs values (usually less than stoich). So, if you reduce that scaler to 14.13 your open loop AFR’s (in reality) will be slightly leaner. You probably won’t notice it, unless you have a wideband to watch it change slightly. If you give me an example parameter that you want to change, I can walk you thru it? See the attached picture
    Actually if you set the Stoich to 14.13 it will even change the closed loop air/fuel ratio value to deliver MORE fuel via longer pulsewidth. Your BLMs will drop some if you already have them close to 128, you will see them shift lower overall. The shift will not be drastic, but it will definitely shift lower. If you want you can scale your VE table by multiply the whole table by 0.96. The difference between 14.7 and 14.13 is right at 4%. Pull 4% out of your VE table and you will be golden. Your open loop air/fuel ratio will be richer. Your PE air/fuel ratio will not be.

  11. #26
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast355 View Post
    Actually if you set the Stoich to 14.13 it will even change the closed loop air/fuel ratio value to deliver MORE fuel via longer pulsewidth. Your BLMs will drop some if you already have them close to 128, you will see them shift lower overall. The shift will not be drastic, but it will definitely shift lower. If you want you can scale your VE table by multiply the whole table by 0.96. The difference between 14.7 and 14.13 is right at 4%. Pull 4% out of your VE table and you will be golden. Your open loop air/fuel ratio will be richer. Your PE air/fuel ratio will not be.
    Just when you think you have things figured out this happens......Here is an example: VE tables are tuned with the same gas (no ethanol) and all BLMs are perfect (128) while in closed loop.... The scaler stoich AFR was set a 14.7 during the tuning process.... Wideband gauge is reading 14.7 AFR (1 lambda)....Now, I change the stoich AFR scaler to 13 and make a run with the same gas. You're saying the ecm is going to trim my fuel to run richer in closed loop (approximately 13 at the wideband)? In other words the BLM will increase (go above 128) to make the mixture richer than 14.7?
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  12. #27
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by mmigacz View Post
    Just when you think you have things figured out this happens......Here is an example: VE tables are tuned with the same gas (no ethanol) and all BLMs are perfect (128) while in closed loop.... The scaler stoich AFR was set a 14.7 during the tuning process.... Wideband gauge is reading 14.7 AFR (1 lambda)....Now, I change the stoich AFR scaler to 13 and make a run with the same gas. You're saying the ecm is going to trim my fuel to run richer in closed loop (approximately 13 at the wideband)? In other words the BLM will increase (go above 128) to make the mixture richer than 14.7?
    Here is what happens. The Command Air/Fuel ratio is used directly in the equation the ECM uses to calculate pulsewidth. If you decrease the value, commanding richer the ecm will lengthen the pulse width. This will cause the engine to run richer. Since the 02 sensor is not an air/fuel ratio sensor rather a Lambda sensor it will continue switching around the stoichiometric value of the fuel. I am going to use a made up example to further explain. Lets say you have an engine that runs perfectly at 14.7:1 on a regular gasoline that is 14.7:1. Now you switch to a fuel with a stoich value of 20:1. No changes are made to the ECM or injectors. Your BLM value will drop to a lower value. Now lets say we change to a fuel with a 10:1 stoich. With no changes the BLMs will rise through the roof. Now if you change the stoich scaler to match the fuel in use the same tune can still be utilized with some other tweaks. Crank, AE/DE and PE to name a few. Years ago I played with running a TPI engine on E85 and the tune only required minor changes. With the 7730 ECM I was running ALL fuel calculations were modified from the stoich value. I changed the stoich value. I then increased the AE by the percentage of change of the stoich value and decreased the DE by the same. The result was a tune that was very close.If we run the same fuel and switch the stoich value to 10:1, the 02 sensor will still switch at the same 14.7:1 but the ECM will be commanding a longer pulsewidth, the BLMs will drop way below 128. Now if you change the stoich value to 20:1 the ECM will make the pulsewidth shorter and the BLMs will rise far above 128.I hope my explination makes sense.In your scenario changing the stoich value would initially give you a richer mixture, but the 02 sensor would quickly start trimming the fuel back and if the BLMs could provide sufficient trimming, you will end up back at 14.7:1 with BLM values lower than 100. If you are having any doubt set it at say 13.5:1 and let it run and watch what happens.
    Last edited by Fast355; 01-29-2017 at 10:16 PM.

  13. #28
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    416
    Before i was taking pictures of the text box before it disappeared. Now i can just read it with the edit xdf option. Thanks. I have a couple question. Do i only need to change the stoich afr to 14.13 or do i need to change other parameters........................................ .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .."Stoich of Fuel used, Gasoline is 14.7 and E10 fuel is closer to 14.13 The value labeled 'stoich' needs to match the O2 sensor AFR switch point. This stoich value, plus the R/L O2 error boundaries, define the O2 sensor output levels. This ties the O2 sensor calibration into the PW equation.As the R/L O2 Error Boundaries define actual O2 sensor stoich switch point in output volts. The 14.7 AFR switch point of the O2 sensor is now 'calibrated' into the PW calculation.If a different fuel is used, with say a stoich value of 16.1, by placing the value of 161 at 0x2AA, the PW is again calibrated for that fuel. If you now want to command the ECM to change the PW enough for a 15.3 AFR, by using 153 in the PW calculation, the PW will be increased the proper amount to produce that AFR (in open loop)............................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ............................................"What does this mean "If a different fuel is used, with say a stoich value of 16.1, by placing the value of 161 at 0x2AA"?where is 0x2AA?............................................ .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ............................................My other question is when adding AE should i just add tps ae or should i also add map ae. Right now i doubled my map and tps ae from stock. When tuning the ae how do i know if i should add tps ae or map ae? Thanks for all your help. trucks running better already. PS. sorry about all the periods. Cant figure out how to space lines.
    Last edited by joegreen; 01-30-2017 at 06:11 AM.

  14. #29
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Before i was taking pictures of the text box before it disappeared. Now i can just read it with the edit xdf option. Thanks. I have a couple question. Do i only need to change the stoich afr to 14.13 or do i need to change other parameters. "Stoich of Fuel used, Gasoline is 14.7 and E10 fuel is closer to 14.13 The value labeled 'stoich' needs to match the O2 sensor AFR switch point. This stoich value, plus the R/L O2 error boundaries, define the O2 sensor output levels. This ties the O2 sensor calibration into the PW equation.As the R/L O2 Error Boundaries define actual O2 sensor stoich switch point in output volts. The 14.7 AFR switch point of the O2 sensor is now 'calibrated' into the PW calculation.If a different fuel is used, with say a stoich value of 16.1, by placing the value of 161 at 0x2AA, the PW is again calibrated for that fuel. If you now want to command the ECM to change the PW enough for a 15.3 AFR, by using 153 in the PW calculation, the PW will be increased the proper amount to produce that AFR (in open loop)."What does this mean "If a different fuel is used, with say a stoich value of 16.1, by placing the value of 161 at 0x2AA"? where is 0x2AA?My other question is when adding AE should i just add tps ae or should i also add map ae. Right now i doubled my map and tps ae from stock. When tuning the ae how do i know if i should add tps ae or map ae? Thanks for all your help. trucks running better already.
    TPS AE is used when the throttle plate moves. MAP AE is used furing manifold pressure changes. TPS AE is a short burst of fuel where MAP AE is more sustained. Generally you want to balance them both out. You can tell when you have too much or too little MAP AE when the transmission upshifts at part throttle with no throttle input changes. If you get a lean or rich spike on a part throttle upshift you need to adjust the MAP AE. Generally speaking TPS AE is like the pump cam on a Holley carb and the MAP AE is like changing the squirter. The decay rate is like changing the accelerator pump capacity. Longer decay = longer duration of AE.

  15. #30
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Thanks Fast355! I understand how it works now.
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    "?where is0x2AA? .
    See the attached picture. You can change the bin thru the hex editor or the thru the parameters defined in the XDF. Stoich AFR is already defined in the XDF, so just put in the AFR of the fuel you are using. In this case 14.13.
    Quote Originally Posted by joegreen View Post
    Cant figure out how to space lines.
    Me either.
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-02-2016, 02:58 AM
  2. Falling flat...
    By Rally Smith in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2015, 05:36 PM
  3. Flat tappet cam and Vortec heads
    By buddrow in forum Gear Heads
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-29-2015, 07:49 PM
  4. Hello from Wichita Falls, TX
    By devind in forum Introductions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-15-2013, 02:41 AM
  5. Flat tappet cams and todays oil NO GOOD!
    By EagleMark in forum Gear Heads
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-12-2012, 07:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •