Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: '94 LT1 EEHack analysis using WB

  1. #16
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    Can't speak on any technical aspects of simulated NB signals. I've read the arguments from guys saying it doesn't work/not recommended.
    I've done it before, and compared tunes after the fact with a NB installed and the WB in a dedicated bung.

    This was just the easiest method/solution on the car for me.
    It isn't a track car, and just a stock engine with 140k on it, that I wanted to run better. Fuel isn't the same as when they were built/tune developed by GM.
    It's pretty obvious with the WB installed that they're running on the lean side.
    My initial data & calculations showed it was off by ~4% running the stock tune. With a little tuning it runs much better, and I'm happy with the results.
    Might not be the "right" way, but it works for me.
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

  2. #17
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Belarus
    Age
    36
    Posts
    152
    old thread to the top
    I need some explanations
    Ive got an innovate wb sensor. Just the sensor with no controller. Is there a way to make it work directly? And if yes then is there any manuals how to do it?

  3. #18
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Age
    41
    Posts
    149
    Nope, you need to have WB controller.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •