Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: LT1 knock module comparison?

  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219

    LT1 knock module comparison?

    It's well documented on the LT4 module being less sensitive, but has there ever been a comparison of other modules done?
    There are several different ones, it would be interesting to see the actual outputs compared.
    There may be a less sensitive one besides the LT4?
    For example maybe a 1996 LT1 b-body module is less sensitive than a 1994 b-body module...

    Borrowed from http://lt1swap.com/lt1_bcc.htm

    16177700
    1994-1995
    F-Body 5.7L
    1 CONFIRMED
    16188309 1994-1995
    B-Body 5.7L
    2 CONFIRMED
    16188709 1994-1995
    B-Body 4.3L
    2 CONFIRMED
    16177690 1994-1995
    LT1-Corvette
    2 ?? CONFIRMED
    16214661 1996-1997
    F-Body 5.7L
    1 CONFIRMED
    16214681 1996
    LT4 Corvette
    2 ?? CONFIRMED
    16214671 1996
    5.7L B-Body
    2 CONFIRMED
    16214691 1996
    4.3L B-Body
    2 CONFIRMED

    Last edited by babywag; 10-19-2016 at 10:34 PM.
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

  2. #2
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,027
    "sensitivity " is a metric relative to the acoustics of your particular engine, so any testing would be very specific to that build.

    an lt4 module isn't "less sensitive" it just rejects and accepts different sound. in fact there is a chance it will be "more sensitive" on a particular engine.

  3. #3
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,027
    how about reverse engineer the filter, get a signal generator and log knock counts. you can map out exactly what frequency each module it considers knock. then its a matter of a scope on any engines knock sensor with eehack jacking up timing to force knock, to determine the best knock module or if one is even appropriate

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    I was merely curious if anyone has ever take a closer look @ the different modules and compared them.
    They have to have differences in the output signal(s) based on the excluded/included frequencies.
    Otherwise there would simply be one for all LT engines.

    Rumor has it the LT4 module was designed to exclude the "noise" from the roller rockers, and that is why they are less "sensitive" on the LT1.
    But, has anyone ever (like you said) put them to the test, and posted their findings?

    Too bad I didn't get interested in this stuff several years ago.
    Used to have a group of engineers @ work, with all the test equipment one could ever want to use.
    They were always up to a challenge.
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,022
    I thought about reverse engineering the filter. Instead, I just turned-off the knock retard and quit worrying about it. Having knock detection would be nice, but it's hardly necessary to have.

Similar Threads

  1. Lt1 vs Lt4 knock module
    By atlantadan in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-20-2016, 05:03 AM
  2. need 100k ohm knock sensor and esc module
    By joegreen in forum Buy - Sell - Trade - Wanted
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-26-2015, 08:23 PM
  3. Cross Counts, IAC, Duty Cycle - relevant comparison?
    By Scrib in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-20-2013, 05:08 AM
  4. Knock Counts and Knock Retard Degrees – AUJP $8d
    By 84Elky in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-19-2013, 07:10 PM
  5. Knock Counts and Knock Retard Degrees – AUJP $8d
    By 84Elky in forum Fuel Injection Writeups Articles and How to New and Old
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-19-2013, 12:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •