Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: TBI timing

  1. #1
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7

    TBI timing

    I would apprecitate some help in my tbi conversion. Its on a straight 6 landcruiser engine. I added timing control by wiring in a pickup coil onto the stock distributor, have the coil and ignition module wired up from a s10 pickup truck. I have aldl droid so I can monitor live data. When I monitor the timing, the timing slowly works its way up from 1 to 90 degrees and then back to 1 and repeats the cycle. This has had me concerned so I checked the timing with a timing light, and at idle the timing is at 20 degrees while my live data just continues the count from 1 to 90. Whats strange is that at wot on a hill the counting pauses, then when I let off on a flat it continues upward to 90. I was reading that you are supposed to jump the knock sensor pin to a 5volt reference. I did not do this-I can but is it necessary? Also I read the ignition module is supposed to have a heat sink on it, mine never has. Is my module toast? Also I found the signal wire on the module (one of the wires going to the 4 pin plug) had rubbed through and was grounding so I am fixing that too. So I ordered a new module and heatsink. In aldl droid it lists the timing reading as ignition timing from hack. What does hack mean? Thanks for any help you guys can provide.

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! sturgillbd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, VA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    504
    If you are using a 1227747 ecm, you have to apply a patch to the bin to get spark advance into the datastream. Your bin has not been patched so what you are seeing is not spark advance. Are you using a stock EPROM or are you burning your own chips?

    Brian

  3. #3
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by sturgillbd View Post
    If you are using a 1227747 ecm, you have to apply a patch to the bin to get spark advance into the datastream. Your bin has not been patched so what you are seeing is not spark advance. Are you using a stock EPROM or are you burning your own chips?

    Brian
    Thanks for the response. I am burning my own chips. Yes I have the 7747 ecm. A patch? I've never heard of that.

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Age
    52
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by sturgillbd View Post
    If you are using a 1227747 ecm, you have to apply a patch to the bin to get spark advance into the datastream. Your bin has not been patched so what you are seeing is not spark advance. Are you using a stock EPROM or are you burning your own chips?

    Brian
    I need to do the same thing for my 5.7 transplant into my S10. I don't want to incur $300+ in purchases to get this ability- is there a simpler way to do it?
    -Phil, in Charleston, SC

    '89 S10 Blazer: SOA SAS: Dana 44s, 5.7L V8, 700R4; 35s, 4.10:1; TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '94 Grand Cherokee: 4.0, 4" lift, 31s
    '90 Jeep Cherokee: In progress: 5.7L V8,700R4,NP231C, D44s. TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '87 Fiero GT: 3.8SC (initial research stage)

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Six_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,968
    Quote Originally Posted by 89S10_Project View Post
    I need to do the same thing for my 5.7 transplant into my S10. I don't want to incur $300+ in purchases to get this ability- is there a simpler way to do it?
    You can buy all of the tuning equipment need to simply datalog and burn for very cheap, if you're handy with soldering and don't mind using somewhat more difficult to use programmers than the ones geared towards automotive tuning.

    I gotta be honest though, I'm handy in both arenas (I work/play with electronics), and the "extra" expense of buying the Moates gear just makes it so easy. The Emulator(s) that are available make tuning VERY easy to do, and you can see the effect of the changes immediately (for most parameters), which cuts tuning time WAY down compared to the log n' burn method.
    The man who says something is impossible, is usually interrupted by the man doing it.

  6. #6
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Six_Shooter View Post
    You can buy all of the tuning equipment need to simply datalog and burn for very cheap, if you're handy with soldering and don't mind using somewhat more difficult to use programmers than the ones geared towards automotive tuning.

    I gotta be honest though, I'm handy in both arenas (I work/play with electronics), and the "extra" expense of buying the Moates gear just makes it so easy. The Emulator(s) that are available make tuning VERY easy to do, and you can see the effect of the changes immediately (for most parameters), which cuts tuning time WAY down compared to the log n' burn method.
    So would it be better to do the notes conversion or get the EBL upgrade?

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pocono's PA.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    370
    Brian ,

    Have you used the off brand EEproms ? I tried a pack of 20 (I think) a while ago , only 1 or 2 out of the whole pack were good , went back to using genuine SST's from then on .

    Just wondering if they have changed .

    Thanks

    TOM
    1994 3500 Dually , 502 (509) , 264HR , Edelbrock MPFI , PFI '7427
    1992 S-10 434 SBC/Tremec - '7427
    1986 Monte Carlo SS
    1984 S-10 , SAS, 496/700R4/205 , D44/14BFF -'7427
    1980 Z-28 496/700R4
    1979 Corvette 496/700R4
    1977 Olds 98 Regency 403/700R4

  9. #9
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Age
    52
    Posts
    162
    Thanks for the intel, Brian. I will compare the price of standing up a system with those components (and real SST chips- can anyone provide a link?) versus the ready-made system and see what I can come up with.

    I'm an IT guy so I have a decent background in the theory, if not the application. I think at the very worst, this might get me startedf inexpensively so I can get a few idsues resolved in my truck and implement the ECM upgrade soonest.
    -Phil, in Charleston, SC

    '89 S10 Blazer: SOA SAS: Dana 44s, 5.7L V8, 700R4; 35s, 4.10:1; TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '94 Grand Cherokee: 4.0, 4" lift, 31s
    '90 Jeep Cherokee: In progress: 5.7L V8,700R4,NP231C, D44s. TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '87 Fiero GT: 3.8SC (initial research stage)

  10. #10
    Fuel Injected! sturgillbd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, VA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    504
    Actually I have used several of them. I have one in my Willys jeep right now and two more in some friends' rides. I bought 20 of them and have had no problems. The difference between the Winbond and SST chips seems to be the erase voltage. I can program the fakes with a Burn 2 but have to erase with my Willem. Seems like the SST is 12V and the Winbond is 14v. I just use my Willem programmer to program/erase them and have no issues. I actually tested the first batch of them by burning a bin to each chip and then went back and did a read and compare. Everything worked great. What programmer do you use Tom?

    Brian

  11. #11
    Fuel Injected! sturgillbd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, VA
    Age
    50
    Posts
    504
    Screenshot of the Winbond datasheet.

  12. #12
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Pocono's PA.
    Age
    50
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by sturgillbd View Post
    Actually I have used several of them. I have one in my Willys jeep right now and two more in some friends' rides. I bought 20 of them and have had no problems. The difference between the Winbond and SST chips seems to be the erase voltage. I can program the fakes with a Burn 2 but have to erase with my Willem. Seems like the SST is 12V and the Winbond is 14v. I just use my Willem programmer to program/erase them and have no issues. I actually tested the first batch of them by burning a bin to each chip and then went back and did a read and compare. Everything worked great. What programmer do you use Tom?

    Brian
    APU1

    Guess I'll give them another shot .

    Thanks Brian , hope all is well .

    TOM
    1994 3500 Dually , 502 (509) , 264HR , Edelbrock MPFI , PFI '7427
    1992 S-10 434 SBC/Tremec - '7427
    1986 Monte Carlo SS
    1984 S-10 , SAS, 496/700R4/205 , D44/14BFF -'7427
    1980 Z-28 496/700R4
    1979 Corvette 496/700R4
    1977 Olds 98 Regency 403/700R4

  13. #13
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Age
    52
    Posts
    162
    Brian-

    Thanks again for the links to the equipment. I'm ordering a batch this evening, then I intend to learn how to use it and patch my chip so I can get real data for spark advance and injector util.
    -Phil, in Charleston, SC

    '89 S10 Blazer: SOA SAS: Dana 44s, 5.7L V8, 700R4; 35s, 4.10:1; TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '94 Grand Cherokee: 4.0, 4" lift, 31s
    '90 Jeep Cherokee: In progress: 5.7L V8,700R4,NP231C, D44s. TBI with 1227747 ECM
    '87 Fiero GT: 3.8SC (initial research stage)

Similar Threads

  1. Timing issue???
    By damanx in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-28-2013, 10:01 PM
  2. Injector Timing
    By Caleditor in forum OBDII Tuning
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-05-2013, 01:59 AM
  3. timing questions
    By steveo in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-29-2013, 02:35 AM
  4. $0D MPFI, base timing and injector timing
    By JeepsAndGuns in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-25-2013, 04:55 PM
  5. $58 timing with DIS
    By Six_Shooter in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 09:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •