two big $EE questions

**jthompson122183** · 06-27-2015

here is what changed when i zeroed the inverse tableAttachment 9169 Attachment 9168

**jthompson122183** · 06-27-2015

here is what changed when i zeroed the end of injection tableAttachment 9171 Attachment 9172

**steveo** · 06-27-2015

funny how he'd just add that stuff without explaining them? i will add the power enrichment stoich value for sure.

**jthompson122183** · 06-27-2015

there definition help file looks like it hasn't been updated in a long time. so much stuff missing. Attachment 9182 Attachment 9183 Attachment 9184

**jthompson122183** · 06-28-2015

well i can confirm that raising the EGR Enable - Coolant Temp(Hi Startup MAT) and EGR Enable - Coolant Temp(Low Startup MAT) out of range keeps the pcm from activating the egr. before i would see 12.5v being commanded in the logs, even though the other egr stuff was (supposedly off), not now.

**kur4o** · 07-23-2015

I think mystery is resolved about when VE tables are used and that ve enable bit is all about.

It looks like byte_12029 bit $08 is for ENABLE MAF DIAGNOSTIC, if maf fails also use VE tables.
In that case VE tables are used only when Maf error code is set.

If you play with the two bits there is three valid combination
USE VE tables only
byte_12028 bit $02 = 1
byte_12029 bit $08 = 0 or 1 (it doesn`t matter because it is skipped)

USE MAF only (PCM will not use VE tables, if MAF fails car will die)
byte_12028 bit $02 = 0
byte_12029 bit $08 = 0

USE MAF and allow VE tables if Maf fails (STOCK SETTINGS)
byte_12028 bit $02 = 0
byte_12029 bit $08 = 1

**steveo** · 07-23-2015

that actually does make sense. wonder why im getting anomalies with the car seemingly responding to the VE tables. it definitely did seem to affect trims. maybe i need to do more testing to confirm my results.

**jthompson122183** · 07-27-2015

So is the ve vs maf mode figured out yet? Time to move on to spark variance in power enrichment? Do any of you use Facebook? There's all kinds of lt1 groups with thousands of members that might be interested in helping if they knew about dissasembly. One of the biggest groups is "lt1 nation!!"
Just a thought.

**jthompson122183** · 09-04-2015

another factory calibration from a 1994 a4 with 2.73

**jthompson122183** · 11-19-2015

Kur4o said earlier in this thread that If there is a spark adder routine it is located at loc_5F96, looking at the lt1 diss (im very noob)

Code:

5F96	57              @135	asrB	5F97	F7 01 4A        	staB	L014A
5F9A	DE A1           	ldX	l_00a1_ref_period_12x
5F9C	FC 20 46        	ldD	L2046                             ; $0510 (1296)
5F9F	02              	idiv	                                  ; integer 1296/00a1 -> X
5FA0	8F              	xgDX	                                  ; -> D
5FA1	04              	lsrD	                                  ; / 2
5FA2	C9 00           	adcB	#$00
5FA4	F7 01 4C        	staB	L014C
5FA7	F6 01 4A        	ldaB	L014A
5FAA	FB 01 4C        	addB	L014C
5FAD	F7 01 49        	staB	l_0149_tts_GP6ESPKO
5FB0	12 01 20 22     	brset	L0001, #%00100000, @138
5FB4	86 5A           	ldaA	#$5A
5FB6	10              	sBA	
5FB7	16              	tAB	
5FB8	B6 15 F6        	ldaA	L15F6
5FBB	01              	nop	
5FBC	FE 15 F6        	ldX	L15F6
5FBF	3A              	aBX	
5FC0	FF 14 54        	stX	L1454
5FC3	12 23 80 04     	brset	L0023, #%10000000, @136
5FC7	86 03           	ldaA	#$03
5FC9	20 02           	jr	@137

12046 would be the extra spark adder?

**kur4o** · 11-19-2015

It`s more of a scalar from reference pulse, than direct adder. It needs logging to find out how it works.

**johnny_b** · 06-27-2016

Originally Posted by kur4o

I need somebody to test Forced Open Loop at Zero TPS patch

Eside byte_616b value changed to $26
Eside byte_616c value changed to $08

Was there any success with the "Open Loop @ 0% TPS" patch?

**steveo** · 06-28-2016

not as far as I know, but using power enrichment for that purpose works fine for idle enrichment (set <1200rpm tps% to enter pe to zero, use a blm locker, then use pe to nail idle afr)

**kur4o** · 06-28-2016

This is the latest version of patch.
It should be working version.
You can try of three diferent versions of the patch.
If you want to test it let me know of the result and if there is a problem I can fix it.
Development was dropped due to lack of interest and beta testers.

**johnny_b** · 07-01-2016

does one of these methods hold an advantage over the other?

As for the BLM locker, if I am flashed with the latest $EEHack patch V3 do I still need to apply the BLM locker separately in TunerPro?