Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: negative vacuum readings at WOT

  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161

    negative vacuum readings at WOT

    I was datalogging a hole shot and noticed that the vacuum dropped to -3 HG (yes negative) after the throttle was fully opened up. I think its impossible to get pressure rather than vacuum at WOT. Has anyone seen this when datalogging using the $42-1227747-V5.2 acquisition file?

    Attachment 8966
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    40
    Maybe you could upload the adx so people who don't have it don't have to look for it???

    I don't understand the question. Inches of Mercury is negative. If you connect a typical vacuum gauge to an engine and it reads 20 at idle, thats -20 inches of mercury below atmospheric pressure. Shut the engine off it reads 0 and positive pressure is going to read pounds per square inch.

    So it's impossible to read negative inches of mercury. Must be a problem with the adx.

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Attachment 8969

    Look at the datalog. Tunerpro is displaying 11 inches of Hg (positive value) at idle. When I open the throttle up (WOT) it displays -3 inches of HG (negative). Tunerpro must be displaying vacuum (negative pressure) with positive values (right or wrong, that's what its doing).

    So does it seem strange that at WOT the vacuum values become negative?
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  4. #4
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,031
    i think that adx is broken.

    it takes a linked value from MAP KPA, then applies this formula: 29.9-(X*.349)

    that isn't a good conversion afaik. think about it for a sec, 100kpa (which should be atmospheric pressure, WOT, no vacuum, should be 0 inches of mercury)

    that'd be 29.9-(100*.349) = 29.9-34.9 = -5

    derp?

    kpa to in/hg should be 0.295

    i do suck at math but i think you should go with 30-(X*0.295)

  5. #5
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,031
    also you should get used to using MAP KPA to evaluate everything, thats what every scan tool, tuning program, etc. displays. i wouldn't even have inches in my adx.

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Here's the whole story:

    I go on a web site called correctcraftfan.com (inboard ski boat forum). The guys on the forum go back and forth about what power valve to use (2.5 or 6.5) on their holleys. With my capability to datalog (TBI conversion), I wanted to show them when the power valve actually opens based on engine vacuum (the power valve number is based on vacuum in inches of mercury).
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected! mmigacz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sheboygan Falls, WI
    Age
    50
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by steveo View Post
    i think that adx is broken.

    kpa to in/hg should be 0.295

    i do suck at math but i think you should go with 30-(X*0.295)
    Thanks Steveo!

    that definitely makes more sense.
    1986 ski centurion boat, 351W, gt40P heads, edelbrock performer rpm, 1227747 ecm, 72 lb/hr injectors (@18 PSI fuel pressure), .490/.490 lift, intake 278 duration, exhuast 282 duration, 112 lobe separation

    1969 camaro, 355ci, performer RPM intake, camel hump heads, 1227747 ecm, 454 throttle body (@18 PSI fuel pressure),

    2016 Chevy Cruz

    2014 Chevy Silverado

  8. #8
    EFI tuning addict 96lt4c4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bardstown KY
    Age
    44
    Posts
    267
    Usually if you still have vacuum at WOT then you have a restriction on the intake, TBI, air cleaner...etc

    -1999 Hugger Orange SS, LS2 402 T56, 9 inch Ford 3.90 gears, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -2002 Cavalier, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -1994 Full Size Blazer ,383 TBI 4L60E, 4.10's, Tuned with Tunerpro RT (Where it all began)

Similar Threads

  1. Idle vacuum
    By tedjan in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-20-2015, 05:23 PM
  2. Pulse width readings high
    By trmccarty in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2014, 07:29 AM
  3. MAP voltage VS KPA/Vacuum
    By buddrow in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 05:44 AM
  4. Using vacuum to tune a timing table??????
    By devind in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-01-2013, 09:24 AM
  5. TBI Pictures, Information on vacuum ports
    By EagleMark in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-16-2012, 09:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •