Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Rocker arm ratio

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Age
    50
    Posts
    10

    Rocker arm ratio

    Hey! I'm thinking of trying 1.6 ratio rockers on my Chevy C2500 350. It's got the stock TBI heads with new valve springs that can handle the lift. I have an Edelbrock can and they say to use only stock 1.5 ratio rockers. Any one tried this? And what was the outcome? Thanks!

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! DOCBAWRENCHTURNER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Age
    38
    Posts
    59
    is it the Edelbrock fuel injection rated cam? If so they are probably just trying to keep the cam's lift within a range that can be handles by a stock TBI PCM

  3. #3
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Age
    50
    Posts
    10
    Yeah, it's the 3702.

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected! jim_in_dorris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    803
    One thing to consider is that with the increase in ratio, the geometry will change and your push rods may rub on the holes where they come through the head causing premature failure. It is common to enlarge those hole to make sure your push rods do not touch. The stock TBI PCM doesn't care about your lift, however it will run better with tuning. That cam even with the 1.6 ratio lifters will not be a problem. However if you have the stock 193 heads, some folks like a single pattern cam for better performance.
    Square body stepsides forever!!!

  5. #5
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,041
    the difference between 1.5 and 1.6 on a smaller cam is really not much.

    unless you're upgrading to full roller already or have them laying around, i wouldn't waste your money and time.

    i went from 1.6 back to 1.5 on a mid-sized cam and ve barely even changed, the butt dyno didn't even feel it.

  6. #6
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Age
    50
    Posts
    10
    I was just going to change the intake side so it would act more like a single pattern cam as far as lift is concerned. But if it really won't make a noticeable difference, then I might leave it alone. Probably not, I'll most likely mess with it, because as good as my truck runs, I cannot leave it alone, it's like a treasure hunt for horse power. Thanks!

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,315
    Quote Originally Posted by steveo View Post
    the difference between 1.5 and 1.6 on a smaller cam is really not much.

    unless you're upgrading to full roller already or have them laying around, i wouldn't waste your money and time.

    i went from 1.6 back to 1.5 on a mid-sized cam and ve barely even changed, the butt dyno didn't even feel it.
    On the otherhand, I have put them on several different engines, noticed small changes in the VE, but have also seen gains of 10-20 HP depending on the setup. I will only use 1.6 or 1.7 full roller rockers on stuff I build. I put them on a TBI engine that was running a stock LT4 cam and stock heads and felt noticeable gains.

Similar Threads

  1. 95 k1500 Gear Ratio change
    By FTK_Ray in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-30-2015, 08:27 PM
  2. where is the fuel map table for 1227165 to adjust air fuel ratio
    By carcaper in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-10-2014, 07:08 AM
  3. 95 tahoe vss correction via RPM/VSS Ratio?
    By bgwhtahoe in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2013, 01:02 AM
  4. arf ratio at idel
    By ony in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-09-2013, 04:12 PM
  5. 10 to 1 compresion ratio engine gasoline
    By EagleMark in forum Gear Heads
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-13-2011, 07:10 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •