Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Twenty Thousand Degrees Advanced

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! JeepsAndGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    alabama
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,705
    I remember something like this happening to me once. If I remember correctly, I changed a spark advance setting, maybe a bias setting, and did not reset the ecm before I installed the chip and run it.
    I just remember the spark advance number on my ADX jumping to some crazy stupid number and it running like doo-doo.
    I have no idea if this has anything to do with your issue, but just figured I would share.
    79 Jeep Cherokee, AMC 401, T-18 manual trans, hydroboost, 16197427 MPFI system---the toy

    93 Jeep YJ Wrangler, 4.0L, 5 speed, 8.8 rear, homebrew hub conversion and big brakes, hydroboost, 2.5in OME lift, 31x10.50's---the daily driver

    99 Jeep WJ Grand Cherokee limited, 4.0L, auto, 2wd, leather and power everything, 99% stock---the long distance highway ride.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    i get the feeling that the spark is being reported as a 16-bit value but someone never set the box for signing.

    23,000/.35 = 65,714, which is right around the 16-bit limit, indicating spark is happening negative to reference(or TDC, i don't know the late TBI code too well).
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  3. #3
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Seattle
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7
    I think Robertlsaar is on to something.
    It makes sense that the ecu would try to retard the timing, but then mis-interperet the negative data.
    It also makes sense that super-retarded timing wound backfire the intake.
    Would a ADX make difference here?
    Could you guys suggest/link one for my $OE bin?

  4. #4
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,055
    lets see the adx you're using it can probably just be fixed

    also i really dont see why the calibration shouldn't be set up to clamp timing to 0 degrees minimum anyway. since when has a car engine actually wanted spark after top dead center?

  5. #5
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    lowish RPM, WOT with a quick throttle transition to get there(triggering burst knock protection or torque management in the process)?

    i could see it going ATDC from that.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  6. #6
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Seattle
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7
    how do i upload my ADX to this thread?

  7. #7
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,867
    If you click "go advanced" you'll be able to attach it as a file. Or send it to me and I can attach it.

Similar Threads

  1. Did you ever just loose 10 degrees timing? Math?
    By EagleMark in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 05-30-2016, 11:38 PM
  2. 8 degrees retard on stock timing table.
    By Scrufdog in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 08-06-2014, 02:14 AM
  3. chevy 5.7 timing degrees?
    By Tyree in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2014, 03:30 AM
  4. LT1 Camaro $EE running 41 degrees of timing at WOT
    By 96lt4c4 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 06:28 PM
  5. 23,000 degrees spark advance!
    By CDeeZ in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-07-2012, 01:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •