Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 47

Thread: $E6 ~ $OE ~ $OD ~ $31 ~ $42 VE Fixer Spread Sheet

  1. #16
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    15
    I have logged data and now ready to use the spread sheet. Which "Insert New Near Idle VE Table to Tuner Pro" Correction Factor with or without Averaged BLM Tables. I am pretty sure I figured it out. I used with Averaged BLM Tables.

    Thanks,
    Ninerscout
    Last edited by ninerscout; 04-06-2012 at 06:13 AM.

  2. #17
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,304
    Quote Originally Posted by ninerscout View Post
    I have logged data and now ready to use the spread sheet. Which "Insert New Near Idle VE Table to Tuner Pro" Correction Factor with or without Averaged BLM Tables. I am pretty sure I figured it out. I used with Averaged BLM Tables.

    Thanks,
    Ninerscout
    I think I need some additional information to help out. I think your TBI is before 1993? There are two TBI ECM's used from 1987 ~ 1992, 1227747 / 1228747. There is a huge difference between the VE tables used on the 1st generation TBI computers. The Near Idle / Off Idle tables were on PCM's from 1993 ~ 1995.

    Let me know what you have, then I can better answer the question.

    dave w

  3. #18
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    There's little tabs on bottom, one to left is for 1227747 $42. I think Dave put that in for me... Then near Idle and off Idle for the newer PCMs. I love it, have used them all now. Great work Dave!

    Tips! When you highlight all cells in TunerPro History Table theres no way to copy, you must keyboard CTRL C to copy. Can also highlight all cells in the VE spreadsheet and CTRL V for paste or right click paste. A box will open and want to know how to paste, just click Tab and OK.

    When you open your VE table in TunerPro you can do it the same way with keyboard but there you can Copy and Paste too.

    Just play with it, if you mess it up just close it and it will ask if you want to save changes and say NO, then reopen.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  4. #19
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    15
    I have both the 7747 and 8747 computers. I am currently using the 7747 since it looks like it has more support than the 8747. I am new to fuel injection and want to start simple. Is the 8747 better? I know it is newer since I took it out of a 1990. I played around with the spread sheet and Tuner Pro, it looks like I am doing it correctly. I am using the $42 VE Correction Table and pasting the Table at the bottom Correction Factor With Averaged BLM Tables in Tuner Pro. My BLM log is getting better with each chip I burn. I am also have some questions about the data logging but I will start a new thread in the Tuner Pro section.

    Thanks
    Ninerscout

  5. #20
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,304
    The '7747 is a good ECM and uses a two VE tables, one table to 3200 RPM and the other VE table is an adder table. The '8747 has one VE table which goes up to 4800 RPM. There are pro's and con's to both ECM's. I favor the '7747 because of the software that is available and lots of people know how to tune the '7747. EagleMark has very good information on the '8747 here: http://www.gearhead-efi.com/Fuel-Inj...hlight=1228747


    For the more experienced tuner the '8747, having only one VE table to 4800 RPM is VERY NICE!

    dave w

  6. #21
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Well there's lots of rumors that there is no def files for 8747 which we know is not true. It's just as good an ECM as the 7747 and I wouldn't hesitate to use one.

    But comparing the definitions the 7747 $42 is way more documented and I have compiled anything and everything and then some into the XDF and ADX for it because I have owned a factory 1227747 vehicle for 8 years. If I owned a 8747 I would probably put the time and effort into those files as well.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  7. #22
    EFI tuning addict 96lt4c4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bardstown KY
    Age
    44
    Posts
    267
    Is there any way to force the PCM to stay out of PE and AE for easier VE tuning?

    Never mind I figured it out

    set the TPS PE tables to 100%
    and zero out the TPS and MAP AE tables
    Last edited by 96lt4c4; 08-12-2012 at 07:30 PM.

    -1999 Hugger Orange SS, LS2 402 T56, 9 inch Ford 3.90 gears, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -2002 Cavalier, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -1994 Full Size Blazer ,383 TBI 4L60E, 4.10's, Tuned with Tunerpro RT (Where it all began)

  8. #23
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    You might not like drivability or get good data with no AE.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  9. #24
    EFI tuning addict 96lt4c4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bardstown KY
    Age
    44
    Posts
    267
    I will leave it on then.

    -1999 Hugger Orange SS, LS2 402 T56, 9 inch Ford 3.90 gears, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -2002 Cavalier, Tuned with HP Tuners
    -1994 Full Size Blazer ,383 TBI 4L60E, 4.10's, Tuned with Tunerpro RT (Where it all began)

  10. #25
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,304
    Quote Originally Posted by 96lt4c4 View Post
    Is there any way to force the PCM to stay out of PE and AE for easier VE tuning?

    Never mind I figured it out

    set the TPS PE tables to 100%
    and zero out the TPS and MAP AE tables
    There is the option of using Excel to "Sort" the AE Active & PE Active data from the exported Excel spreadsheet. That's kind of an advanced class lesson for using Microsoft Excel.

    dave w

  11. #26
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    What is the history average table for?

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  12. #27
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Central Az.
    Posts
    6
    If my BPW is @ 110, will this spreadsheet still work, or is there a way to?

    Im running a 7.4 TBI, 7747, on a Caddy 7.0 engine. I am close, but wondered if this would still work on my tune?
    '75 Jeep truck with a '79 Caddy 7.0 using an '87 GM 7.4 TBI

  13. #28
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,304
    Yes, you will need to use the '7747 sheet to tune the VE Table.

    dave w

  14. #29
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Age
    33
    Posts
    38
    I have logged data into Tuner Pro and would like to know if I should be using the "Without Averaged BLM Tables" or "With Averaged BLM Tables."

    I have a 1988 ASDX bin and $42 XDF file in Tuner Pro.

    --
    Kris

  15. #30
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,304
    Quote Originally Posted by 350yj View Post
    I have logged data into Tuner Pro and would like to know if I should be using the "Without Averaged BLM Tables" or "With Averaged BLM Tables."

    I have a 1988 ASDX bin and $42 XDF file in Tuner Pro.

    --
    Kris
    Without average is - course tune.

    With average is - fine tune.

    If most of the BLM averages are more than 138 or less than 118 use course tune.

    dave w

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •