honestly it's hard to motivate myself to work on automatic transmission stuff since i'll never actually own one... but i'll sure give it a shot as i'm going through some other stuff. can't be that big of a peice of code, right
mark i finally have a static link to the current version of my xdf for our EE thread, maybe you should clean that one up a bit:
http://resfilter.net/files/carstuff/...DF_CURRENT.zip
Done!
1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
-= =-
"it is still slightly sensitive to changes to the intact tract design"
I'm guessing that should be "intake tract"
BTW great work!
Whats the issue with the single MAF table again? That was what I really liked about the XDF in 2.4. Gave a great view of the overall table. I have seen some calibrations where the breakpoints from table to table are very bad and have always had to put them into my excel program to fix this.
it's a tunerpro thing.
it's the fact that trying to view or repair the smoothness of the maf tables with the 2d graph is friggn impossible (unless you have a truly gigantic monitor), since you cant zoom/scroll 2d graphs in tunerpro. also the table is so long, it opens offscreen and you have to resize it every time.
you know, we could have both views in there, the split up and the complete one, as long as you were willing to deal with the consequences of it probably not being a good idea to have both open at the same time.
maybe i should do that. i have another release coming up in a day or two, im fixing a whole ton of less-than-ideal data type/precision/range/labeling type stuffs..
Yeah that may work. I like my excel spreadsheet but its nice to do it all in Tunerpro.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks