Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: NASA "Day of Remembrance" Jan 31, 2014

  1. #1
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    244

    NASA "Day of Remembrance" Jan 31, 2014

    Today is the Day of Remembrance dedicated to the 3 Apollo-1, STS-51-L Challenger and STS-107 Columbia.
    info and comments from President Obama and NASA Administrator Astronaut General Charlie Bolden can be seen here.
    http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/DO.../indexalt.html
    Apollo-1 January 27, 1967 23:31 UTC
    fire at the launch pad in a "plugs out" test with 100% O2 atmosphere in capsule
    Command Pilot
    Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom
    Senior Pilot
    Edward H. White II
    Pilot
    Roger B. Chaffee


    STS(SPace Transportation System) 51-L Challenger
    -Teacher in Space January 28, 1986 16:38:00 UTC
    Vehicle broke apart due to aerodynamic forces 73 seconds after launch
    Commander Francis R. Scobee
    Second spaceflight
    Pilot Michael J. Smith
    Only spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 1 Ellison S. Onizuka
    Second spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 2 Judith A. Resnik
    Second spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 3 Ronald E. McNair
    Second spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 1 Gregory B. Jarvis
    Only spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 2 S. Christa McAuliffe
    Only spaceflight
    Teacher in Space

    STS 107-Columbia
    Launched 16 January 2003 15:39:00 UTC
    1 February 2003, 13:59:32 UTC
    Shuttle broke apart during re-entry after hot gasses penetrated left wing via damage sustained by a piece of foam strijing the RCC heat panel at a speed differential of over 500mph (Shuttle was supersonic, but the foam had slowed some by the time it hit the wing)
    Commander Rick D. Husband Member of Red Team
    Second spaceflight
    Pilot William C. McCool Member of Blue Team
    First spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 1 David M. Brown Member of Blue Team
    First spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 2 Kalpana Chawla Member of Red Team
    Second spaceflight
    Flight Engineer
    Payload Commander Michael P. Anderson Member of Blue Team
    Second spaceflight
    Mission Specialist 4 Laurel B. Clark Member of Red Team
    First spaceflight
    Payload Specialist 1 Ilan Ramon Member of Red Team
    First spaceflight
    STS-107 crew was split up into 2 teams, a Red and Blue team. this was done to accomodate the huge amount of science that STS-107 was assigned. While one team slept, the other worked. SHown in the following pic.


    Condolences to the families, friends of these brave people. And to others involved in the Space Program who have fallen as well. Lest we forget, and let us honour their contributions with continued future human spaceflight.
    peace
    Hog

  2. #2
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Truely sad to see all those great people lost in one paragraph. Contributions to science and technology from the space program is huge, but as we can see this is a dangerous journey.

    God Bless all those lost as well as the entire program for the future!

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Six_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,968
    Not to make light of this, I remember all of the news coverage and backlash of the Challenger explosion... but it seems that January is a bad month to launch...

    I've been curious where the space program is going to head. Last I heard the shuttle program was canceled, or had run out it's life cycle, but haven't heard of any concrete ideas of what the next launch vehicle is going to be.
    The man who says something is impossible, is usually interrupted by the man doing it.

  4. #4
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    There was even a movie about January temperatures and Oring failure do to temperatures.. testing was never done to as low as it was that day but they knew there were issues.

    Our president right now is not interested in space program. Our government is split and at a stand still. Actually the only thing he is interested in is changing America from what it has always been to... well... the land of no opportunity. Just equality. There's no reason to strive to be the best and succeed anymore. Half the government is trying to stifle his efforts till next election so we can get on with life!

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  5. #5
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,041
    i think privatization of payload launching is definitely the way forward, i'm not too sad that the american government isn't behind it anymore. i don't blame them, in their current economic state, there's just not a lot of profit. as long as there's an economic demand for satelite payloads (and, in the future, resource collection) it'll keep going.. at least we can thank them for all of the work they've done to kickstart further space ventures.

    the engineering behind those launches was incredible, and they're so expensive, real-world testing and incremental improvements of any changes is nearly impossible.. all you have to rely on is a giant team of number crunching physists... no wonder there were a few faults here and there

    at least they knew what they were in for, you should kinda plan to die in a fireball if that's your chosen profession

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    244
    Coming in October there is a launch planned of the new NASA vehicle "Orion". It is capsule based and will launch atop the Delta IV Heavy configuration. The Orion will be orbitted out to 33,000 miles then will deorbit at speeds not seen since the Apollo program. This will test the new parachute systems, heatshield-plasma temps exceed the BOILING point of steel. The test will be unmanned.

    Then for the new NASA launch vehicle, SLS (Space Launch System) will launch from pad 39-B, the same location some of the Shuttles launched, using teh same but modifield crawler transports, same but modified MLP(Mobile Launch Platform) that Apollo and Shuttle missions launched from(these huge platforms are lifted by the Crawlers and transport the rocket, supply tower-each MLP weighs about 8,000,000 pounds empty and about 11 million lbs with an unfuel SHuttle aboard.

    MLP

    Saturn V on the MLP


    New SLS rocket


    SLS evolving



    The new SLS rocket will load the MLP up to its max weight of 18 million pounds because the launch tower along with the rocket must be carried. With Shuttle the launch tower stayed at the pad.
    Currently there are 16 of the SSME's(Space Shuttle Main ENgines) in storage.
    SSME thrust production at percentage of rated thrust.
    100% thrust 380,000 lbf 470,000 lbf
    104.5% thrust 390,000 lbf 490,000 lbf
    109% thrust 420,000 lbf 510,000 lbf


    Normally the engines are run at 104% then throttled down to 65% as the stack breaks the sound barrier(maximum aerodynamic loading or Max Q) then throttled back up to 104%. In an engine shutdown occurs, the remain 2 would then be upped to 109%. And then use 1 of teh following abort modes,\
    Return to Launch Site (RTLS) Can only occur after solid boosters jettison after 124 seconds, then the Shuttle and main fuel tank perform a 180° turn (engines still thusting) then shut off engines, drain the tank, jettison tank then glide back to the Shuttle LAnding Facility near the launch pad.
    Trans Atlantic Landing(TAL) Shuttle lands in PSain or the other available sites suitable ofr Shuttle landings. NASA send out C5 Galaxy cargo planes to the TAL landing sites before each launch. Just in case.$$$$$$
    Abort Once Around (AOA) Shuttle is going too fast for an RTLS or TAL abort, so it lands back in teh USA after 1 orbit which takes about 90 minutes.(The windoiw where teh AOA can be used is only seconds in duration.
    Abort To Orbit (ATO) This abort mode was used when there was sufficient thrust avaolable to reach orbit SAFELY albeit slightly lower than planned. This was the ONLY in flight abort which was EVER used. It was during STS 51-F with Challenger. 3 minutes 31 seconds into flight the #2 engine had a primary sensor fail, then 2 minutes 12 seconds later the secondaty backup sensor failed thus shutting down engine #2. And an Abort To Orbit was called. Meanwhile back down in Houston a female Booster Systems Engineer was seeing the remaining engines sensors approaching redline and if those sensors tripped further engine shutdowns would occur thus chaning the ABort to Orbit to different scenario that would put the crew/vehicle into a possible LV/LC(Loss ofVehicle/Loss of Crew) scenario. Quickly the engineer Jenny M. Howard made teh call to "set limits to inhibit" essentially telling the Main ENgine Controller to ignore the redlining sensors and to NOT shutdown the remaining 2 SSSME's from shutting down from those particular sensors. MS. Howards quick thinking saved the mission(which was deemed a success) but more importantly possibly saved the Astronauts lives.

    Each SAL launch will use 4 SSME's, and 2 solid rockets boosters, similar to the SHuttle, but longer with a 5th segment vs. 4 segmants for SHuttle The Block 1 rocket will be able to carry 70 metric tons to Low earth Orbit. Since th SSME's AKA RS25D will not be reused, there are enough main engines for 4 flights. These SSME's are worth about $50 million a piece. There will be a new engine RS25E, E for expendable which is almost the same as the SSME/RS25D except the that building an expendable engine allows for much less work, costsing about $20 million a piece. After the existing solid rocket boosters are used up, tehre will be a competition to either use new solid boosters, or possibly liquid fueled boosters. In its Block 1-A and Block 2 the SLS rocket will be able to launch over 130 metric tons into low Earth Orbit. This newer configuration will use 4 RS25E's, 2 new solid/liquid boosters and 5 3rd stage brand new J2X engines which were tested in 2013.
    The launch rate for SLS will be around 1 launch every 1.5 years.
    Eventually SLS will be taller than the Saturn V that was used for Apollo space launches. SLS will be the most powerful rocket ever launched.

    A very preliminary and unofficial schedule based on a worst case budget has outlined some early SLS flights as:
    Mission Targeted date Variant Notes
    SLS-1/EM-1 December 2017 Block I Send Orion/MPCV on unmanned trip around the Moon.
    SLS-2/EM-2 2021[110] Block I Send the Orion (spacecraft) with four members to an asteroid that had been robotically captured and placed in lunar orbit two years in advance.
    SLS-3 August 2022 BlockIA
    SLS-4 August 2023 BlockIA
    SLS-5 August 2024 BlockIA Mars Sample Return Mission
    SLS-6 August 2025 BlockIA Manned "Exploration" Mission: Orion BEO picks up Mars sample & returns to Earth
    SLS-7 August 2026 BlockIA Cargo launch
    SLS-8 August 2027 BlockIA Manned launch
    SLS-9 August 2028 Block1A Cargo launch
    SLS-10 August 2029[ BlockIA Manned launch
    SLS-11 August 2030 BlockIA New configuration, Cargo launch
    SLS-12 August 2031 BlockIA Manned mission
    SLS-13 August 2032 Block II New configuration, Cargo launch

    NASA is now usincommercial contracts to replenish the International SPace Station, and it is also providing finding to companies to deliver humans to and from the ISS now that ISS will stay on orbit until at least 2024. Some of the crew commercial flights are to take place in 2017 as well.
    Here isDreamchaser which is in teh running for NASA' Commercial crew contracts.


    Shuttle on MLP/Crawler


    SSME's awaiting testing for the new SLS rocket. Certification of tehse engine for SLS usuage will begin in 2014.


    peace
    Hog
















    SSME thrust settings
    100% thrust 380,000 lbf 470,000 lbf
    104.5% thrust 390,000 lbf 490,000 lbf
    109% thrust 420,000 lbf 510,000 lbf

Similar Threads

  1. TunerPro datalog "monitor" time zooming issues.
    By damanx in forum TunerPro Tuning Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-23-2013, 06:09 AM
  2. Replies: 55
    Last Post: 11-13-2013, 03:55 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-28-2013, 06:38 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-10-2012, 08:38 AM
  5. Plug readings by Bruce Plecan AKA "Grumpy" R.I.P. dedication
    By EagleMark in forum Fuel Injection Writeups Articles and How to New and Old
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 09:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •