Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: EE o2 delay

  1. #46
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    not much i can say about it... it creates a skewed airflow number(for..... some...... reason) that is only used for these O2/INT/CORRCL calcs. why there is also a requirement for the table's result to be skewed up to 16 at a minimum as well, i have no clue.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  2. #47
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,044
    haha yeah i figured, i love that kind of thing; i just wanted some more ideas for documentation. sounds like time to make some shit up.

    that CORRCL is a real cherry! i'm going to have fun with that one. i didnt even know EE had that code.

  3. #48

  4. #49
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,044
    so far results are great, i found a bin that had particularly bad blm splits (pretty close to stock) then pushed the integrator base delay right up to ~400ms at idle, and lowered the entire base CORRCL table by 8. the splits nearly dissapeared, and the integrator seemed much more stable. i'll keep playing with it.

  5. #50
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    FYI, when O2 sensor moves farther back the INT delay get's increased...

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  6. #51
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by steveo View Post
    i've never seen it be that dramatic; i betcha something else is going on there
    I've double and triple checked everything else so I believe it has to be in the tuning. The car works great everywhere except when I crank the throttle open from idle. I threw some more more PE fuel at it and it went away but I bricked the PCM which put an end to testing. I finally got the parts from China and fixed the PCM but now there is too much snow to drive the car.

  7. #52
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,044
    Quote Originally Posted by EagleMark View Post
    FYI, when O2 sensor moves farther back the INT delay get's increased...
    did i say any different?

  8. #53
    LT1 specialist steveo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,044
    i've never had such maniacal laughter after testing a bin

    i started from scratch again just to play around

    thing is, where i live, in a very slow driving old people area with lots of stop signs and crosswalks, where you have to creep around a lot.. i have always been beating the crap out of the blm system, as well as whatever decel code there is. it never played nice.

    after three tries just guessing with increasing delays and dumbing down CORCCL a bit, i managed to improve int/blm stability a LOT, my splits are now +/- 2 on average, and the integrator is much more stable. the log of the integrator could have been mistaken for a lazy o2 sensor before, if you know what i mean. it always seemed, from the logs, that transitions between cells 16/17 to normal cells was part of it.

    on a whim i went back, re-enabled transient fuel map, and nerfed BLM cells 16-18 like i was originally planning to do, so everything is happening in regular cells now.

    this method worked before, probably because my integrator was so unstable, idle/decel was badly corrupting whatever cell it fell into, and when it ended up being used for driving range, it would stumble. i always had weird drivability issues.

    i also tried my best to set my cell boundaries so decel has its own cells to play in, and so does idle.

    transient throttle response is awesome again, and i dont have any weird decel surging problems. even if i try, find a cell and blip the throttle it without breaking through hysterisis, all the cells seem very stable, probably because the CORRCL mode works like it should

    this is awesome stuff! i dont know how i would have done it without these extra o2 parameters

Similar Threads

  1. ecm install question..Delay before it functions?
    By xtreamvette69 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 03:08 AM
  2. Headers/integrator delay
    By dyeager535 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-18-2013, 08:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •