Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Performance Timing Table Chevy 5.7 Liter TBI ECM 1227747

  1. #1
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285

    Performance Timing Table Chevy 5.7 Liter TBI ECM 1227747

    Below is a .pdf document showing a performance timing table I've used on dozens of stock or nearly stock Chevy 5.7 Liter TBI engine using the 1227747 ECM. I strongly recommend Adjusting the VE Table when making any changes to the timing table! Use at your own risk!

    dave w
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477
    Ahhhhh? You built that in a mask/XDF that does not take out the "SA - Spark Bias - Main"

    So if someone add's that table to my $42 XDF it will be 9.84* to much!

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  3. #3
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285
    Quote Originally Posted by EagleMark View Post
    Ahhhhh? You built that in a mask/XDF that does not take out the "SA - Spark Bias - Main"

    So if someone add's that table to my $42 XDF it will be 9.84* to much!
    Below are a couple screen shots showing the same timing table, one with the $42 TunerPro website .xdf and Marks V5.9.2 .xdf.

    dave w
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  5. #5
    Electronic Ignition!
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    10
    Sorry not trying to be a noob haha. But If I add that table to the bin I have downloaded from this website which happens to be the ones you guys mention. My tables should look like the first pic? And if using the bin from tunerpro website it should look like the second pic?

  6. #6
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477
    Bin is the same. The issue is the XDF from this website automatically removes the Spark Bias so what you see in spark Advance table is actual timing. Not timing with 9.84 degrees added to it. (if small block, if big block there is no bias so any XDF will show actual timing)

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,311
    Quote Originally Posted by dave w View Post
    Below is a .pdf document showing a performance timing table I've used on dozens of stock or nearly stock Chevy 5.7 Liter TBI engine using the 1227747 ECM. I strongly recommend Adjusting the VE Table when making any changes to the timing table! Use at your own risk!

    dave w
    Not doubting you have used those values with suucess but in my heavy van I saw good results with more initial timing and a quicker advance curve and less total timing.

  8. #8
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477
    And a little lightener car would be better with more, depending on heads. Even a big heavy truck can be totally different if it has some tall gears! So it's only a guideline. Watch your knock sensor counts!

    But I gotta add a little warning for those finding this and not taking into consideration some other adders to spark!

    First is "SA - Max RPM for Spark Slope" which adds timing after the 3600 RPM because that is as high as the Spark Advance table goes in these 7747 $42 ECM. So say a stock ADSU chip adds 5.05 degreees per thousand but it only adds to "SA - Max RPM for Spark Slope" 4200 RPM so that's about 2.5* which it no longer needs with a table like this.

    Then there's "SA - PE Spark Added" which will add up to 4.92* which is no longer needed... or can be played with.

    What I'm getting at is with Dave Spark Advance table total at WOT of 31.99 + the Spark Slope of 2.5 + the PE spark of 4.92 you could end up with 39.41 total advance by 4200 RPM! Which is to much for any street vehicle on pump gas!

    Watch your knock sensor counts!

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  9. #9
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast355 View Post
    I saw good results with more initial timing and a quicker advance curve and less total timing.
    Stock camshaft?

    dave w

  10. #10
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,311
    Quote Originally Posted by dave w View Post
    Stock camshaft?

    dave w
    Yes, the stock GM "395" roller camshaft. However the engine was 8.75:1 and had piston oil cooling jets. I had 1.6:1 full roller rockers and doug thorley tri-y headers on it along with an edelbrock 3704.

  11. #11
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast355 View Post
    Yes, the stock GM "395" roller camshaft. However the engine was 8.75:1 and had piston oil cooling jets. I had 1.6:1 full roller rockers and doug thorley tri-y headers on it along with an edelbrock 3704.
    Thanks for the reply. Good information to know when setting up the timing table. Most all stock TBI motors (light pickups) have very mild flat tappet camshafts with a lift of .351 / .386 (very likely to be the lowest lift cam GM used in the Chevy 5.7 liter engine). The timing table I posted works great with stock flat tapped TBI camshaft I describe. The "395" cam mentioned, (if I'm remembering correctly) has a lift of .414 / .431. If I'm remembering correctly the .414 / .431 roller camshaft was used in the "Police" TBI 5.7 liter in the early 90's. In all fairness, camshaft comparison is not exactly apples vs. apples (roller vs. flat tappet vs. lift profile).


    dave w

  12. #12
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Euless, TX
    Posts
    2,311
    Quote Originally Posted by dave w View Post
    Thanks for the reply. Good information to know when setting up the timing table. Most all stock TBI motors (light pickups) have very mild flat tappet camshafts with a lift of .351 / .386 (very likely to be the lowest lift cam GM used in the Chevy 5.7 liter engine). The timing table I posted works great with stock flat tapped TBI camshaft I describe. The "395" cam mentioned, (if I'm remembering correctly) has a lift of .414 / .431. If I'm remembering correctly the .414 / .431 roller camshaft was used in the "Police" TBI 5.7 liter in the early 90's. In all fairness, camshaft comparison is not exactly apples vs. apples (roller vs. flat tappet vs. lift profile).


    dave w

    Dave,

    Not sure where you got your cam info from, but only the B/D-car roller cam engines had that small of a cam. They had the "155" peanut roller cam in them. The police cam is the "156" and is the same as a L98 TPI 350. I have pulled apart numerous TBI 350 engines that had the "929" cam in them. .383/.401" lift and 193/204 duration, 108 ICL on a 112 LSA.

  13. #13
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast355 View Post
    Dave,

    Not sure where you got your cam info from, but only the B/D-car roller cam engines had that small of a cam. They had the "155" peanut roller cam in them. The police cam is the "156" and is the same as a L98 TPI 350. I have pulled apart numerous TBI 350 engines that had the "929" cam in them. .383/.401" lift and 193/204 duration, 108 ICL on a 112 LSA.
    Fast,
    The pic below is some of the information I have on SBC camshafts. Is the information in the pic correct?

    dave w
    Attached Images Attached Images

  14. #14
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Tulsa, Ok
    Age
    48
    Posts
    457
    Ok, bear with me here if you will.

    1. Are those cam specs cam lift or valve lift?
    2. Mark, just out of curiosity what is "too high" for knock counts? my stock asdu runs about 20-40 on average. Conversely my buddies truck ive been tuning on, with the asdu bin had knock counts running ramped at idle not to mention on a drive. Ill try to log some this weekend and share with you. I did get it to idle steady and improved driveability over the asdu with the modded chip. need to lean out the low end a little but over all it runs reasonably well. I know there is still more there being a 383cu. in. though.

    Happy Tuning,

    Buddrow
    If it don't fit force it, if it don't force fit f&%@ it!

  15. #15
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,285
    Quote Originally Posted by buddrow View Post
    Are those cam specs cam lift or valve lift?
    Figures below the "Lift @1.5" are valve lift, using 1.5 ratio rocker arms. Cam lift multiplied by rocker arm ratio = valve lift.

    dave w

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-12-2019, 10:02 AM
  2. $0D MPFI, base timing and injector timing
    By JeepsAndGuns in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-25-2013, 04:55 PM
  3. 1994 chevy 2500 5.7cid erratic timing
    By TRBBenicia in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2013, 08:00 PM
  4. Setting base timing for performance cam
    By srgould41 in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-27-2013, 10:33 PM
  5. Using vacuum to tune a timing table??????
    By devind in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-01-2013, 09:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •