Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: TBI Fuel volume delivery? are 5/16" and 1/4" fuel lines too small?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    Quote Originally Posted by EagleMark View Post
    Yes. Smaller line less volume.

    Yes.

    It will work on low HP engines, but you have obviously found there is a difference! If you ever swap to bigger lines I'd like to here results of test.

    12-13 PSI, stock pressure on factory stock engine comes with maxed out VE table. Actually some are more then 100%?
    I would have done it already, but dropping the tank is a real pain on these things, and the fuel sender needs modification for the larger sizes.
    I may up the return line to 5/16" since I could use a stock supply line I have laying around.
    Modifying the return tube of the sender isn't bad.

    I did make some progress today, I can FINALLY run it in closed loop without it yanking fuel/throwing fits and going lean as H*LL.
    Through comparison of the WB gauge to AFR displayed in TunerPro I noticed that stoich wasn't being reported as 14.7
    Tunerpro was reporting 15.5 AFR when WB gauge was showing 1.0 WTH?!?
    I've been fighting with this thing forever, and was ready to light it on fire and roll it down a hill.
    Open loop it would run great, every time I would re enable closed loop it would have a fit.
    Even on the 7747 it was doing the same thing, and with no way to get the AFR into the datastream I NEVER would have seen this.
    I've been driving this thing around in open loop for months, kind of defeats one of the main benefits of FI.

    So I messed with the WB analog outputs.
    I changed them gradually until 1.0 on the WB display was = 14.7 reported AFR displayed in Tunerpro.
    Enabled closed loop, fired it up and BAM it runs like it should.

    Now the previous analog settings worked my other truck and it was running fantastic and very easy to tune w/ the WB.
    That truck has virtually the same set-up, but runs a lower FP and the VE tables aren't maxed out as much.
    Why I would have to change the analog outputs that worked fine on the other truck to accommodate this truck I have NO IDEA.

    I'm soooo sick of this truck, but we'll see if I'm finally the blind squirrel who found his nut?

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! shimniok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    73
    FWIW, and I am late to the party, but I am running the stock feed/return hard lines. I've had no problem dialing in the VE tables and in fact have a bit of fueling to spare (max VE1+VE2 is probably 95 or so).

    So, looks like I will be coming back to this thread among others when I get arond to running a WB. Whee. :)
    1986 Jeep Grand Wagoneer - stock AMC 360 V8, 3" exhaust - 1227747 ECM - $42 ASDU - tc.wagoneer.org - www.bot-thoughts.com

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    Hoping I finally figured this out.
    Tried a stock bin and started from scratch vs. the bin from my '88.
    My BLM numbers were pretty low 110-120.
    Seemed odd to me, and still not agreeing with how it felt when I drove it, and what the wideband was telling me.
    Removing fuel was only going to make it run worse, because it wasn't running that rich, and actually lean in some places according to the wideband.

    So, thinking to myself I'm missing something simple? but what.
    Well, I'm running 15psi fuel pressure...duh!!!
    I never adjusted the injector flow rates in the bin.

    Changed them to reflect I'm running 15psi, and bam BLM#'s magically telling me what I already knew.
    Showing more realistic BLM#'s now 126-135

    I feel soooo stoopid now
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

  4. #4
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    There's another quick way to fix BLMs! Change Stoich AFR to what E fuel is, 14.13...

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    I don't think that would have done it in this case.

    I had previously changed the bin stoich AFR value to 14.13, and was having the exact same issue.
    Closed loop BLM#'s saying richer than stoich(contrary to wideband), PCM pulling fuel and going lean.
    I could force open loop and get it to run fine and maintain whatever AFR commanded in tables.
    Anywho tried that in March. http://www.gearhead-efi.com/Fuel-Inj...oich-14-13-AFR

    Stock injectors ~61lb/hr, but increase the pressure to 15psi and they're more like ~71lb/hr.
    61*sqrt(15/11) = 71.23
    So changing the injector flow rate from 61 to 71 was it. One little setting.

    Changing stoich AFR in the bin is a PITA, have to change all the other values/tables too.
    Easier to just leave it @ 14.7 and just calculate using stoich.
    Pretty sure that's how the code works behind the scenes?

    I may say or type 14.7, but my brain is thinking 1.0.

    All I know is this thing runs the way it's supposed to now, and the PCM is friends with the BLM#'s.
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

  6. #6
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    I wasn't disagreeing, you had found the problem and fixed it right. Thanks for sharing mistakes, it's how we all learn.

    But changing Stoich is just that, no need to change all other AFR tables. Stoich setting is the start of all the other AFR tables.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected! babywag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    219
    So, yesterday got an email from Mr. Injector regarding the old injectors that were installed in this thing.
    (I replaced them with new ones a while back)
    Sent them in to cleaning/testing mostly out of curiosity.

    After cleaning @15psi they only flow ~62lb/hr ~3% less BEFORE cleaning.
    According to GM they should be ~61lb/hr @ 11psi.
    @ 15psi they should flow more like 71lb/hr
    sqrt(15/11)*61=71.23

    So with .bin set to calculate VE based on 61lb/hr = injectors weren't even close to delivering that.
    According to rough math since I don't have the actual pre cleaning numbers yet...
    The injectors were only flowing ~56-57lb/hr @ 13psi.
    Would explain why I had to add so much to VE tables, and why I was maxing out.
    Would also explain why bumping my pressure to 15psi helped somewhat.

    So lesson learned...just because the pressure is good/steady/etc. doesn't mean the flow is
    Tony

    '88 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (aka Babywag)
    '67 Jeep J3000
    '07 Dodge Magnum SRT8

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 55
    Last Post: 11-13-2013, 03:55 PM
  2. AE clamp Flag in $0D ?" and no fuel in decel?
    By EagleMark in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-21-2013, 08:25 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-10-2012, 08:38 AM
  4. Fuel Pump, Filter and lines
    By POZE in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 04-19-2012, 09:35 AM
  5. Plug readings by Bruce Plecan AKA "Grumpy" R.I.P. dedication
    By EagleMark in forum Fuel Injection Writeups Articles and How to New and Old
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 09:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •