Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Quicker way to do Spark Hook test on the street for LT1s and others?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,868
    Over the years of tuning I have found that slightly retarding the timing as the MAP decreases and rpm rises helps keep you in a MPG sweet spot.
    Halleluja! Another believer in less timing can equal better mileage. Setting the timing to occur later can generate more pressure when the piston has greater mechanical advantage over the crank.

    I have never seen anyone hammer bearings, unless they just go crazy with spark advance.
    It only takes a few degrees too many and and it only took a couple of days of light driving to do it. The heater core was getting plugged so I wasn't getting much heat. We were having a cold spell and I was buried with outside projects. So I added a couple of degrees more advance to the spark timing in the 30-50 kPa range at cruise rpm on the highway to try and generate a little more heat in the head. Second day after the changes, I stop at the end of the exit ramp, and the low oil pressure light turns on. The car had run for a year with no trouble and now, with a couple degrees more advance, I had to replace the rod bearings. I might still have them... the upper halves have nice, shiny spots where they should be dull gray. Pulled spark back out, installed new bearings (and larger oil pump since I was in there) and ran for several years before pulling the engine and dumping the body when it rusted out.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Camden, MI
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,026
    ^ one example that came to mind.

    the difference in power between optimal advance and any advance used beyond that is getting used to push the rod bearing into the crank pin... that's never a good thing.



    the peak pressure point is something like ~21* ATDC? if you had an ideal combustion chamber, you could have the spark event take place then and instantly the cylinder pressure would go from what it rises to from the effects of the static compression to the pressure caused by turning a ~300*F air/fuel charge into a ~1500*F fireball.

    unfortunately, a chamber that can do this is either impossible or impractical. so in the real world of street-driven vehicles, we end up with a situation where whenever you can run less advance and make the same amount of(or more) power, it's a good thing for power and economy. emissions.... IDK, that's never been my target for improvement.
    1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3100 + 4T60E


  3. #3
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Atlanta , GA.
    Posts
    31
    sherlock, not to regress but here's a post where you add a resistor on a switch in place of the IAT. It sends a constant temp voltage level to the PCM that is warm enough to maintain closed loop and other fueling tables something like 60* C would work. You then change one row of coolant temp spark correction table for that specific temperature range. It's been used to retard spark when switching on nitrous. http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=41946
    I'm Bob 1994 Z28, A4, CAI, Cam, 1.6RR's, LT's, stall, cat-back, TunerCat $EE, TunerPro RT, TTS Datamaster. Also 2007 GMC Envoy mail order tune , 2015 Kia Sorento stock..

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •