Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: O.E. 5.7 Vortec CPI intake with 16197427 PCM ?

  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291

    O.E. 5.7 Vortec CPI intake with 16197427 PCM ?

    Alright, so I am about to start putting my firebird back together after sitting since before thanksgiving. I took it apart to replace the lifters and decided to do something different with the intake. I have wondered if the induction setup has been part of the problems that have plagued me since installing the vortec 350. The lack of funds has kept me from installing a custom mpfi setup and limited my options so I've been running an edelbrock vortec performer rpm 4bbl intake with a tbi adapter. Anyhow, I have pondered using an original vortec intake setup several times now since it works fairly decent. I know that the vortecs are sequential and that the '427 can only do batch fire, but that isn't a big deal usually. So my question is, does anybody think that using the original vortec intake and injection setup won't work right with a '427 pcm once I have modified the memcal and .bin for multi-port operation ? My fuel system is fully capable of maintaining the 60psi that the vortec injector requires and I can't think of any other hardware issues other than the throttle cable and the (temporary) trans tv cable. Thanks in advance,

    Phil
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  2. #2
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477
    16197427 came with a 4.3 CPI, so the bin file may have all the answers?

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  3. #3
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291
    Well, as far as tuning goes I don't see any major obstacles. My concern was wiring the injectors to run in batch fire mode because if I'm not mistaken the '427 can't operate 8 cylinders in sequential mode. I believe that the memcal modifications on the V8 memcals for multi port only supports batch fire. I am really not overly familiar with the electrical side of the central injector setup. If I am lucky I might find a junkyard assembly that has already been upgraded to the better port located injectors, but that only addresses the sticking poppet and cracked line problems. I am assuming that since the upgrade doesn't alter the computer wiring then the original spider injector operates like 8 individual injectors just all centrally located. I think that is my only major concern is operating that setup in batch fire. I can't think of any reason that should be an issue, but I want to be assured I guess you can say. I need to double check about using a MAF sensor though, as I recall seeing a lot about MAF sensors when using the multi port mod. I can't recall if that was necessary or optional. Aside from that I cannot really think of any real issues with using the setup other than things that I am aware of like blocking off the egr, getting a throttle cable that will work, trying to mount the tv cable until I install the 4l60e, mounting the ign coil, working out the plumbing, etc small things of that nature that I can easily handle. I just try to always have as much input and have my bases covered before committing to a project on my "daily driver" so as to avoid too many surprises and obstacles that result in more down-time. I have been driving my in-law's S-10 that normally sits a lot anyway, but it's running on borrowed time. So I want my car back in service asap and semi-reliable so that I can focus on the V8 swap for the truck and basically doing a semi-restoration on it.
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,847
    The injectors will operate fine in batch mode.
    The upgrade injectors replace the poppets with tiny injectors at the end of the fuel lines.
    MAF is optional.
    Injector corrections might be tough to work out but I'll bet you could get something figured out.

  5. #5
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291
    I was kind of hoping for that kind of reply. The salvage yards are full of complete intakes because the trucks that end up there usually have a blown motor or bad tranny so most of the time people just yank the heads off and leave the rest behind. I also see a lot of trucks where the engine is gone but the intake is sitting somewhere in the truck. I have also seen complete assemblies on ebay for $100-200 if I can't find anything better at the local yards. I've seen plenty of used ones around that have had the upgrade installed so I hope that I can come across one just to avoid the typical problems with the poppets and plastic lines. Either way, I think that going with this setup should at least ease tuning and eliminate any problems that I possibly had with the TBI setup. I'll save the performance mpfi setup for the next engine due to be built after I build one for the S10. Stock vortec is plenty for the ole firebird seing as it makes nearly 100hp over the original L03.
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,268
    Quote Originally Posted by 1project2many View Post
    The injectors will operate fine in batch mode.
    The upgrade injectors replace the poppets with tiny injectors at the end of the fuel lines.
    MAF is optional.
    Injector corrections might be tough to work out but I'll bet you could get something figured out.
    I agree the SCPI conversion to MFI is an excellent idea when considering using a '7427 PCM. http://www.amazon.com/Delphi-FJ10566.../dp/B000TYLIFS

    I agree, the challenge is getting the injector voltage offset figured out! Maybe the injector voltage offsets from the "Black Box" PCM would be a good place to start looking? I'm thinking maybe because it's a conversion designed to work with OEM computer.

    dave w
    Last edited by dave w; 02-14-2013 at 03:47 AM.

  7. #7
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291
    Yeah, I was going to study the "black box" calibrations thoroughly to get an idea of where to start with injector latency and VE. I know there is a difference there with the way I will be firing the injectors and I plan on sticking with speed density and avoiding a MAF sensor. But, the stock calibrations should still give me a good starting point.
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  8. #8
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291
    I knew that amazon had the upgrades cheaper than anyone. Depending on what I end up getting and how much it costs I may go ahead and spring for the upgrade. I did just now notice that multi fuel capability is stated in the notes. I'm thinking that I may like going stock more than I imagined, or at least I hope.
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  9. #9
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    63
    Posts
    10,477
    Not much to Vortec voltage corrections?

    4 to 17 volt...

    0.799805
    0.850098
    0.916992
    0.958008
    0.970215
    0.980957
    0.992188
    1.000000
    1.000000
    1.000000
    1.006348
    1.015625
    1.025879
    1.035156

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  10. #10
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,847
    Stock L31 intake enhances low rpm power like L98, but without the large choke at 4500 rpm. It's going to feel far stronger than the TBI system.

  11. #11
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,268
    I've been thinking the injector voltage offset of the black box PCM is for sequential firing injectors, so batch fire would have different impedance (resistors in parallel)? I'm wondering what the impedance of four SCPI to MFI conversion injectors would measure in parallel? Four injectors in parallel would have a very low impedance, maybe very close to the impedance of one TBI injector?

    dave w

  12. #12
    Super Moderator dave w's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,268
    I measured the impedance of one stock L31 vortec injector = 13.2 ohms. Four stock L31 vortec L31 injectors in parallel = 3.3 ohms. One factory TBI injector will typically measure 4.4 ohms. I would think a 1.1 ohm 10 watt resistor in series with four stock L31 injectors in parallel would allow the '7427 PCM to operate in TBI mode. I would think using the four stock L31 vortec injectors in parallel only would require the '7427 sense resistor modification if wanting to use the '7427 in MPFI mode.

    dave w
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by dave w; 02-14-2013 at 05:38 PM.

  13. #13
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,847
    I've never tried driving saturated injectors in P&H mode. Typically they'd be connected four to a bank in parallel in saturated mode and the sense resistor would not be used.

    With either driver circuit configuration I would select MPFI mode for injector trigger timing.

    I believe the injector voltage corrections are ultimately a system based value, not exclusively an injector based value. After all, wire routing, wire length, manifold design, connector types, and typical underhood temps are all going to play a part in what happens to fuel delivery when system voltage changes. Additionally you might find small changes in fuel supply from pump come into play as well. For most people I believe that starting with OE based values (when available) is the best final answer. But for anyone with the desire and knowledge I recommend determining the values empirically by disabling the charging system and adjusting the corrections as system voltage drops. In this case AFAIK this will be a first for this combination of injector and pcm, so it will be interesting to see how it works out.
    Last edited by 1project2many; 02-16-2013 at 06:35 PM.

  14. #14
    Fuel Injected! pmkls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sevierville, TN
    Age
    44
    Posts
    291
    Well, I definitely got a lot more responses and info than I expected. I'm excited to get working on the project and even more excited to get my car back on the road again. The combination of several factors have kept me from doing anything except just looking at the car sitting in the driveway for a few months now. So it's safe to say that I'm chomping at the bit to be able to drive my car again. With that said, I have some questions about wiring and the driver circuits and some tuning questions. Forgive me, but I'm in the middle of a lot of situations that require a lot of This is where I reach the limits of my knowledge and experience. I have training in electrical theory, but I still have to sketch things out on paper once you get past typical wiring schematics and such. Anyway, I am going to list my questions so as to avoid confusing myself. lol

    1. Was the L31 injector that was measured an original poppet-type or the MFI upgrade type ?
    2. I plan on selecting MPFI mode in the PCM, so I would obviously wire the 4 injectors in paralell. But I would only perform the sense resistor mod and not need a resistor wired in paralell with the injectors, correct ?
    3. I will take resistance measurements of the unit that I end up purchasing, but ultimately the driver circuit should be configured the same regardless of whether the injector assembly is the original poppet-style or the MFI upgrade, correct ?
    4. I would like to better understand the process of how you determine the injector offsets with the charging system disabled.
    I will be out roaming the junkyards tomorrow in search of a manifold assembly and a few other items. Once I actually acquire a manifold setup I will be able to get going on the project. Once I get into the wiring and tuning I will share my results as I go and will inevitably have more questions. If the manifold works as good ad I think it is then I am going to go that route with my S-10 V8 conversion because it is so cheap, seemingly simple, and shouldn't have any hood clearance issues.
    1999 GMC Sierra 1500 standard cab long bed 4.8 V8 2WD - A work in progress.
    2000 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 - My new daily driver inherited from the wife via the insurance company totaling it out after a minor collision.
    2006 Grand Prix GT sedan 3800 Supercharged - The wife's new grocery getter.

  15. #15
    Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lakes Region, NH
    Age
    54
    Posts
    3,847
    1. Was the L31 injector that was measured an original poppet-type or the MFI upgrade type ?
    The replacement injectors are saturated type as are the original. Electrical characteristics are close enough that they can be interchanged without a recalibration.
    2. I plan on selecting MPFI mode in the PCM, so I would obviously wire the 4 injectors in paralell. But I would only perform the sense resistor mod and not need a resistor wired in paralell with the injectors, correct ?
    Apples and oranges. MPFI mode refers to when the injectors are triggered in relation to the Distributor Reference Pulse. Peak and Hold or Saturated mode refers to the current control mechanism used when the injectors are energized. TBI injectors are typically peak and hold injectors but so are low impedance pfi injectors. 12 Ohms resistance typically puts the injectors in the "saturated mode" category.
    3. I will take resistance measurements of the unit that I end up purchasing, but ultimately the driver circuit should be configured the same regardless of whether the injector assembly is the original poppet-style or the MFI upgrade, correct ?
    Ultimately, a driver circuit configuration that works with one injector will work with the other.
    4. I would like to better understand the process of how you determine the injector offsets with the charging system disabled.
    I don't actually think I'd try it. Adjusting small PW offsets can be tricky enough without the added complexity of falling system voltage. I'd stick with adjusting the voltage scalars and leave the offsets alone.

    I have a '99 L31 calibration for comparison. There are three tables of interest. Voltage correction to injector flow rate vs voltage, injector latency vs voltage, and small PW correction. For this cal I'd start with the flow rate correction vs voltage table.
    Code:
    Volt  Correction
    4.5   0.800
    5.5   0.850
    6.5   0.917
    7.5   0.958
    8.5   0.970
    9.5   0.981
    10.5  0.992
    11.5  1.000
    12.5  1.000
    13.5  1.000
    14.5  1.006
    15.5  1.016
    16.5  1.026
    17.5  1.035
    Since these values represent change in flow, and the $0D table represents change in time, you'll need to invert them (time = 1 / flow). As a sanity check, when the numbers are correct, the highest voltage values will have the smallest corrections. Here's the table with inverted values:
    Code:
    V  Multiplier
    4.5   1.25
    5.5   1.176470588
    6.5   1.090512541
    7.5   1.043841336
    8.5   1.030927835
    9.5   1.019367992
    10.5  1.008064516
    11.5  1
    12.5  1
    13.5  1
    14.5  0.994035785
    15.5  0.984251969
    16.5  0.974658869
    17.5  0.966183575
    Use Excel or another program to fit this curve to the voltage steps in $0D.

    Small PW offsets look a little different than the typical TBI offset table:
    Code:
    ms  offset
    0.0  -0.34
    0.2  -0.34
    0.4  -0.34
    0.6  -0.15
    0.8  -0.07
    1.0  -0.04
    1.2  -0.04
    1.4  -0.04
    1.6  -0.04
    1.8  -0.01
    2.0  -0.01
    2.2  -0.01
    2.4  -0.01
    2.6  -0.01
    2.8  0.00
    3.0  0.00
    There are two other values to consider as well:
    Base injector latency: .94ms
    Low injector PW Correction Threshold: 2.49 ms.

    The low injector PW correction threshold indicates that no corrections are needed below 2.49ms and it's easy to populate the $0D table with zeros from 2.44ms to 3.9ms. The negative values in the correction table may be the result of table biasing using the base latency of .94ms. I'd start by inputting the base latency value into Async Short BPW Offset Bias (as 940us) then populating the Async Short BPW Offset vs. BPW table with the values from the L31 (again, multiply them by 1000 to get microseconds).

    Finally, there's the latency vs voltage change table.
    Code:
    4.5V 2.424
    5.5V 2.234
    6.5V 1.457
    7.5V 1.167
    8.5V 1.024
    9.5V 0.926
    10.5V 0.835
    11.5V 0.761
    12.5V 0.701
    13.5V 0.653
    14.5V 0.611
    15.5V 0.578
    16.5V 0.547
    17.5V 0.549
    This table may benefit from adjusting on the vehicle. Use Excel or another program to fit this curve to the $0D voltage correction table as a starting point. For this to work you must have the tune so it's good enough for the car to idle in closed loop with BLM and INT showing minimal corrections. The process to get actual changes is to idle the car in closed loop and disable the alternator. Monitor system voltage and BLM / INT. As system voltage approaches the next lower voltage in the correction table, adjust the table entry so there's no BLM / INT correction needed.

    I've uploaded a new $0D definition file version 251 which properly biases the Async Short BPW Offset vs. BPW table table. You might want to head over to the $0D thread to get a copy. http://www.gearhead-efi.com/Fuel-Inj...ull=1#post2202

    ^^^^^^
    Correct file should now be in place.

    HTH.
    Last edited by 1project2many; 02-16-2013 at 06:28 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •