Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: LQ4 Tune Question

  1. #16
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by 2xls1 View Post
    It's not back pressure that is needed. It is you don't want O2 sensors anywhere close to open exhaust so outside air doesn't effect their reading oxygen only in the exhaust. This means absolutely no exhaust leaks anywhere near the O2s. Especially upstream of them and within a couple of feet downstream.
    I am confident there are no leaks beforehand, I can investigate further- but the PCV and injector issues certainly need addressed. Thanks for all the help

  2. #17
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    25

    Update

    Set up a barebone PCV setup and roughed in some injector data from a GTO... From what I looked into- a good VE table should balance out what I haven't touched.

    Set my default&minimum injector width to 1ms off a few HPTuner posts- from what I saw flow rate and VE apparently can handle the rest, O2s still switch at 700 mV, Catalytic Converter Protection disabled (COT to my knowledge), DFCO disabled

    Idles just grand with MAF enabled, with it disabled- again some weird behavior. Minor lurching on low throttle, to be expected with a rough VE.

    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/X8rJbfTt

    The car drives OK at best, but better than it has been. When cruising, it seems to cut spark at a certain rpm/load but I didn't get a good log of this. Don't think it knocked, but unsure.

    I want to confirm I don't have exhaust leaks AFTER my O2/wideband (they are right next to each other, so not sure why they ever contradict) as well as calibrate the MAF.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  3. #18
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Jul 2023
    Location
    Tobaccoville, NC
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3
    This is not going to help you, but I wanted to give props to 2xls1 for his StartupTune_Baselineo2.bin. I have a manual trans behind a 5.3 LM7 and have been trying to get start/idle, deceleration and dying at stops cured and I used this baseline bin and it works great! Thank you guys for sharing your expertise!
    87 Olds Cutlass LM7/TKO600
    87 Chevy Squarebody LM7/4L60E
    91 S-10 2.8/5 speed
    13 Dodge Charger (surplus State Patrol car)

  4. #19
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by Whitelightning603 View Post
    This is not going to help you, but I wanted to give props to 2xls1 for his StartupTune_Baselineo2.bin. I have a manual trans behind a 5.3 LM7 and have been trying to get start/idle, deceleration and dying at stops cured and I used this baseline bin and it works great! Thank you guys for sharing your expertise!
    Glad to hear that's working for you, did you seg swap? That bin is a 6L and has different injector flow rates

  5. #20
    Carb and Points!
    Join Date
    Jul 2023
    Location
    Tobaccoville, NC
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by YungTyph View Post
    Glad to hear that's working for you, did you seg swap? That bin is a 6L and has different injector flow rates
    I used Universal Patcher to compare my existing tune to Startup bin and only changed a few items pertaining to start and idle. It is very drivable but by no means tuned for max performance....yet. This 5.3 was in a early 07 Silverado with automatic trans. After a mail order tune it 'identified ' as a 4.8 with manual trans. I haven't got deep enough to check on Injectors yet. But I have to admit it's interesting to program these engines as I learn more.
    87 Olds Cutlass LM7/TKO600
    87 Chevy Squarebody LM7/4L60E
    91 S-10 2.8/5 speed
    13 Dodge Charger (surplus State Patrol car)

  6. #21
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    233
    Don't segment swap anything into that 6.0 M5 file. You will screw up a lot of the things in the engine cal that are unique to a M5 engine file.

  7. #22
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    233
    Quote Originally Posted by YungTyph View Post
    Glad to hear that's working for you, did you seg swap? That bin is a 6L and has different injector flow rates
    The injector flow rates would only be different of the 5.3 you have was Flex Fuel. Non FF 5.3 would use the same injectors as a 4.8 or a 6.0.

  8. #23
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    25
    Update for all. Tune is feeling MUCH better now. Disabled the O2s and went full open loop off the wideband, seems much more predictable. With the O2s enabled my long term trims were massively negative, with my wideband still reporting decent AFRs. Fueling and airflow feels pretty good for the most part, just need to continue to cruise and smooth it out.

    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/BjFP0kDM
    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/OmRnlRHD

  9. #24
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by YungTyph View Post
    Update for all. Tune is feeling MUCH better now. Disabled the O2s and went full open loop off the wideband, seems much more predictable. With the O2s enabled my long term trims were massively negative, with my wideband still reporting decent AFRs. Fueling and airflow feels pretty good for the most part, just need to continue to cruise and smooth it out.

    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/BjFP0kDM
    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/OmRnlRHD
    Another update for the crowd- changed injector data to known LS2 data, and the car drives even nicer. With that change I nudged the VE table a bit (still in closed loop SD) and the tune generally feels amazing.

    HOWEVER, when giving it a gradual (although faster than normal) increase in throttle I had the car backfire pretty badly. The wideband went full lean, and i coasted to the side of the road to investigate. Is there any possibility I am actually too rich? At this point I dont even look at the O2 sensors for reference, pretty confident they are junk.

    Here is the log showing this event at the end (right before the throttle defaults down to ~17%) Is this just too much throttle for SD? I will dial in the maf soon too, but I want to know its not in my timing or spark or something else.

    I have ordered new O2s and will be messing with the PE aspect of the tune, wondering if I just wasn't kicking in nearly soon enough.

    https://log.tunezilla.com/s/OpWcF3EX
    Last edited by YungTyph; 09-24-2023 at 04:22 PM.

  10. #25
    Fuel Injected! blue68deville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Denver
    Age
    51
    Posts
    111
    Quote Originally Posted by 2xls1 View Post
    Here is a stock 04 Silv 60 MT file. I would start with that. There are a lot of things in your file that are just wrong for a 04 60 MT vehicle.
    I'd also like to thank you for this. It's hard to find manual BINs. Much appreciated.
    68 Cadillac, 472 & TH400 w/7.4L TBI and EBL **sold**

    93 K1500 short step, 5.7 & NV4500 and EBL

    68 C10 LQ4/TKO swapped

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2 Weeks Ago, 05:13 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-06-2023, 12:44 AM
  3. Base Tune or close to spec tune for 0411 SBC406AFR-HSR
    By evilstuie in forum OBDII Tuning
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 08-20-2020, 05:58 PM
  4. Asymmetric fuel question , plus fuel pump question
    By 1967Killer in forum GM EFI Systems
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-29-2018, 10:55 PM
  5. 2000 LS1 Camaro Tune Speed Density / 2bar with TunerCat Question
    By Performance SS in forum TunerCat OBDII
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-19-2016, 07:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •