Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Spark advance tables

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Fuel Injected! myredprky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Age
    57
    Posts
    33

    Cool Spark advance tables

    Help ??????? Can anyone please expalain why with a carb and dizzy setup the ignition timing will go to around 32-36 deg of total advance with a wide open throttle but with tpi (1227730 ecm) the total advance when the kpa values rise is taken down to around 20 deg???? .I am mapping out my ve tables but have noticed that the power drops off as the timming drops off,I have more power by lifting the throttle and bringing down the kpa,s.....?

    engine is
    350 sbc
    with Edelbrock heads
    10-1 compression
    comp cams with 220\230\@50
    Accel manifold base
    ASM runners and ported plenum
    Headman hedders
    and 52mm throttle body.

    I am hopping to get around 400hp from this setup (would that seem right to you guys)
    Do I need to give it a lot more timing at the top end of the kpa vs spark map ????

    many thanks IAN....

  2. #2
    Fuel Injected! gregs78cam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    N. Idaho
    Posts
    767
    From that short parts list I would say 400hp sounds very possible from this setup. And as long as you have a good functioning knock sensor in it, sure, add some timing and see what it likes.
    1978 Camaro Type LT, 383, Dual TBI, '7427, 4L80E
    1981 Camaro Z-28 Clone, T-Tops, 350/TH350
    1981 Camaro Berlinetta, V-6, 3spd
    1974 Chevy/GMC Truck, '90 TBI 350, '7427, TH350, NP203, 6" lift, 35s

  3. #3
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Stock OEM carb and distributor curves were close to EFI for idle and acceleration. Just like a carb and dizzy setup with built motor you can add timing.

    Just sneak up on max timing. There are so many varibles in ECM/Chip and EAT module that your Main Spark Advance will probably not be actual! Check timing with timing light at timing marks at various RPM and see where your timing really is compared to bin or ALDL spark timing data if you have it. Totally warmed up, 3000 RPM and pinch MAP line to cause 100 MAP, get timing, is a good test.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  4. #4
    Fuel Injected!
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    386
    I too would be interested in opinions on the question. As OP said, in early days full throttle 36 degrees, no knock sensor and all was good. Now with efi any time you get rpm and load the timing is 20 degrees and less. Are they worried about making too much power? Are they worried about their warranties? Are they worried about weak transmissions? What do you think the answer is?

  5. #5
    RIP EagleMark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Idaho
    Age
    64
    Posts
    10,477
    Emissions.

    1990 Chevy Suburban 5.7L Auto ECM 1227747 $42!
    1998 Chevy Silverado 5.7L Vortec 0411 Swap to RoadRunner!
    -= =-

  6. #6
    Fuel Injected! myredprky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Age
    57
    Posts
    33
    Thanks guys,,just made a vast improvement by looking into my Enrich Power Spark Advance Vs. RPM table to find it had all been zerod out.I copied over the tables from an super AUJP bin and thats made a big differance in pulling power...But I rekon I should be looking for 32 full advance in wot at 3000 rpm on but my spark map just wont allow it....
    the spark table I have is shown below.....
    Attachment 2881

    should I be going for somthing like this in the 100 kpa range.....?????

    IMG_1857.jpg
    Last edited by myredprky; 08-19-2012 at 09:59 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •