Please test and report. Copied from pcmhacking.net
Printable View
Please test and report. Copied from pcmhacking.net
Conducted multiple reads and writes on a P59 PCM using both an AVT838 and AVT852. No errors to report
using either one. The AVT838 seems to run roughly half as quickly as the AVT852, but in the development
thread, I believe it was noted that the AVT838 runs at 57600 baud while the AVT852 runs at 115200, so this
would seem to be the expected result.
I've attached the two BIN files read from an identical PCM in case they are of use.
I'll post over in my old AVT838 thread on PCMHacking as well. Glad to see the original thread may have inspired
others who are better coders than I am.
-Scott
Odd - was unable to add a second file to the first post. Here it is for reference.
-Scott
Thanks, but unable to test due to prolific usb cable driver weirdness on windows. Same cable works aces on linux host running windows xp virtual. But I'm not excited about building a windows 7 virtual just for this one program.
Should have my other usb adapter Friday to test with (it's in my desk drawer at work).
Their hex terminal program can talk to the Jet cable through the cheapo prolific usb adapter on an XP virtual no problem. Oh windows. How I hate thee. Let me count the ways...